Literature DB >> 7366548

Physical factors determining the utility of radiation safety glasses.

W E Moore, G Ferguson, C Rohrmann.   

Abstract

Ten types of lenses were tested for their radiation protection properties in three experimental circumstances: (a) Their good geometry (scatter free) attenuation was determined as a function of HVL in a direct x-ray beam. (b) Their dose reducing properties were determined under simulated clinical fluoroscopic conditions, using both ion chambers and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) while the lenses, mounted in frames, were worn by a head phantom. The head was oriented in four different directions to simulate clinical conditions in a fluoroscopic room. (c) Their dose reducing properties were measured with TLD's while the glasses were worn by radiologists during clinical fluoroscopic procedures. Although several of the lenses could attenuate a direct x-ray beam several thousand times, none of the glasses offer more than a factor of 8 reduction in eye exposure when the glasses are worn during fluoroscopy. This is attributed to backscatter from the fluoroscopist's head and deficient lateral shielding. Some of the glasses may even be causing an increase in eye exposure when the TV monitor is located 90 degrees or more from the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7366548     DOI: 10.1118/1.594661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of fluoroscopic operator eye exposures when working from femoral region, side, or head of patient.

Authors:  M Jordan Ray; Fawzi Mohammad; William B Taylor; Marco Cura; Clare Savage
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-07

2.  Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; Stephen Balter; Robert Dixon; Renato Padovani; Beth Schueler; John F Cardella; Thierry de Baère
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  Eye protection in interventional procedures.

Authors:  Beth A Schueler; Kenneth A Fetterly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yamagata; Bashar Aldhoon; Josef Kautzner
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.