Literature DB >> 7365405

Brightness contrast: a reinterpretation of compound cue and combined cue experiments with pigeons.

H C Santiago, A A Wright.   

Abstract

A group of three pigeons was trained on a 4-ply multiple schedule: a green color and a vertical line superimposed upon an achromatic background as positive stimuli, and a red color and a horizontal line on an achromatic background as negative stimuli. The pigeons were tested with the vertical line superimposed upon different achromatic background intensities, then with the vertical line superimposed upon different green background intensities, and finally with the vertical line and its training achromatic backgfound attenuated (and unattenuated) by a neutral density filter. The gradients peaked at the luminance of the achromatic background used during training and at the equivalent luminance for the green background when it was substituted for the achromatic background. The brightness contrast, not the background luminance, was the critical variable as the neutral density filter attenuated both the line and the background equally, leaving brightness contrast unchanged; there was no response decrement to this attenuated stimulus. Two other groups of three pigeons showed that they attended to line orientation as well as to brightness contrast. The brightness contrast hypothesis was extended to explain results of attention experiments and combined cue experiments which have used line stimuli in combinations with different backgrounds.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7365405      PMCID: PMC1332915          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Spectral sensitivity in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1957-09

2.  Testing for inhibitory stimulus control with S- superimposed on S+.

Authors:  J M Davis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response summation to a compound stimulus in a context of choice.

Authors:  P J Millier; I L Beale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Inhibitory stimulus control following errorless discrimination learning.

Authors:  M Rilling; H J Caplan; R C Howard; C H Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Recognition by the pigeon of stimuli varying in two dimensions.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some determiners of attention.

Authors:  D F Johnson; W W Cumming
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus generalization and amount of prior training on variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  E Hearst; M B Koresko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

8.  Stimulus control acquired by components of two color-form compound stimuli.

Authors:  D G Born; J L Peterson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Stimulus generalization as a function of discrimination learning with and without errors.

Authors:  J Lyons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Patterning effects with compound stimuli.

Authors:  S L Guth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.