Literature DB >> 7360176

On the readability of surgical consent forms.

T M Grundner.   

Abstract

A great deal of attention has been paid to ensuring that surgical consent forms have valid content, but little effort has been made to ensure that the average patient can read and understand them. Five representative surgical consent forms were analyzed with two standardized readability tests. The readability of all five was approximately equivalent to that of material intended for upper-division undergraduates or graduate students. Four of the five forms were written at the level of a scientific journal, and the fifth at the level of a specialized academic magazine. I suggest that few consent forms currently in use could pass readability tests. The implication of these findings is that thousands of persons may be undergoing surgery each year on the basis of inadequate consent. The problem has a reasonably simple solution: analysis of all consent forms for readability, and rewriting of those found excessively difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7360176     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198004173021606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  15 in total

1.  Patient autonomy, paternalism, and the conscientious physician.

Authors:  Stephen Wear
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1983-10

2.  Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Danny T Y Wu; David A Hanauer; Qiaozhu Mei; Patricia M Clark; Lawrence C An; Joshua Proulx; Qing T Zeng; V G Vinod Vydiswaran; Kevyn Collins-Thompson; Kai Zheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Experimental ethics in sports medicine research.

Authors:  D A Brodie; K Stopani
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Research consent forms: continued unreadability and increasing length.

Authors:  M E LoVerde; A V Prochazka; R L Byyny
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; C Seth Landefeld; Brie A Williams; Deborah E Barnes; Karla Lindquist; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Medical ethics and the two dogmas of liberalism.

Authors:  T F Ackerman
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1984-02

Review 8.  Beyond informed consent: educating the patient.

Authors:  Lawrence H Brenner; Alison Tytell Brenner; Daniel Horowitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The readability of information and consent forms in clinical research in France.

Authors:  Véronique Ménoni; Noël Lucas; Jean François Leforestier; Jérôme Dimet; François Doz; Gilles Chatellier; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Hélène Chappuy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission.

Authors:  D W Baker; R M Parker; M V Williams; W S Clark
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.