Literature DB >> 7357715

Symptom-limited vs heart-rate-limited exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction.

R F DeBusk, W Haskell.   

Abstract

To develop guidelines for exercise testing soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction, 93 men completed a heart-rate-limited (HRL) protocol and 107 completed a symptom-limited (SXL) protocol 3 weeks after the acute event. In the HRL protocol, effort terminated at a heart rate of 130 beats/min in the absence of a limiting symptom, exertional hypotension or ventricular tachycardia. Peak heart rate was not an end point in the SXL protocol. Despite a higher peak heart rate and work load in patients who completed the SXL protocol, the prevalence of exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression and ventricular ectopic activity was similar in the two groups. No complications occurred with either protocol. Twelve patients (6%) had cardiac events within the next 2 months. Regardless of the test protocol used, early events were more common in patients with ischemic ST-segment responses (15%) than in patients without ischemic responses (3%) (p less than 0.01). In contrast, exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias were not predictive of early events. Eleven weeks after infarction, when all tests were SXL, the prevalence of exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression and premature ventricular complexes was similar to that at 3 weeks. We conclude that SXL and HRL exercise test protocols reveal a similar prevalence of ischemic ST-segment depression and ventricular ectopic activity soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7357715     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.61.4.738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  7 in total

Review 1.  Stratifying risk after a myocardial infarction.

Authors:  N F Goldschlager
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-07

2.  Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, psychological wellbeing, quality of life, and vocational status following a 12 month cardiac exercise rehabilitation programme.

Authors:  L D Dugmore; R J Tipson; M H Phillips; E J Flint; N H Stentiford; M F Bone; W A Littler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Self-predicting stress tests. Predischarge modified stress testing after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Nikolic; T Sugiura; D H Spodick
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1982-06

4.  Prognostic value of symptom limited versus low level exercise stress test before discharge in patients with myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytics.

Authors:  K Jensen-Urstad; B A Samad; F Bouvier; J Hulting; J Höjer; H Ruiz; M Jensen-Urstad
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Post-infarction exercise testing in patients under 55 years. Relation between ischaemic abnormalities and the extent of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  I Peart; L Seth; C Albers; O Odemuyiwa; R J Hall
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-01

6.  [The usefulness of an exercise test on a treadmill shortly after a myocardial infarction].

Authors:  P LeBlanc; B Tremblay; D D'Amours; G Tremblay
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Impact of stress testing before percutaneous coronary intervention or medical management on outcomes of patients with persistent total occlusion after myocardial infarction: analysis from the occluded artery trial.

Authors:  Warren J Cantor; Sergio B Baptista; Vankeepuram S Srinivas; Camille A Pearte; Venu Menon; Zygmunt Sadowski; John R Ross; Peter Meciar; Eugenia Nikolsky; Sandra A Forman; Gervasio A Lamas; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.749

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.