Literature DB >> 3947484

Post-infarction exercise testing in patients under 55 years. Relation between ischaemic abnormalities and the extent of coronary artery disease.

I Peart, L Seth, C Albers, O Odemuyiwa, R J Hall.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that the early post-infarction exercise test is useful in predicting the extent of coronary artery disease. The results of a heart rate limited exercise test three weeks after infarction and a symptom limited exercise test six weeks after infarction obtained by both standard lead electrocardiograms and 16 lead precordial maps were compared in 100 consecutive survivors of acute myocardial infarction under 55 years of age. Exercise tests were defined as being positive on the basis of angina, ST segment depression greater than or equal to 1 mm in any electrocardiogram lead, or exertional hypotension. Multivessel disease, that is two or three vessel disease, was present in 60 patients, and three vessel disease in 22 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for multivessel disease of the three week test were 38%, 83%, and 76% respectively; and results for the six week test were 55%, 75%, and 77% respectively. Only 32% of patients with three vessel disease were identified at the three week test, and 59% at the six week test. Significantly more patients with multivessel and three vessel disease were identified by the symptom limited six week test. Precordial mapping offered no advantages over the standard 12 lead electrocardiogram in either the identification of patients with multivessel disease or the prediction of the distribution of coronary artery disease. Angina pectoris during the exercise test at six weeks was the single most useful predictor of multivessel disease. Multivessel disease was found in 27 (87%) of the 31 patients with angina with or without ST depression during the test at six weeks compared with 33 (48%) of the 69 patients who did not have angina during the test at six weeks. Exercise testing in the early post-infarction period in patients under 55 years of age is of limited value in predicting the extent of coronary artery disease. It is, therefore, unreasonable to use such exercise tests to select patients for coronary arteriography after myocardial infarction. None the less angina pectoris occurring during a symptom limited exercise test six weeks after infarction is a strong predictor of multivessel disease, and coronary arteriography is recommended in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3947484      PMCID: PMC1232070          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.55.1.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  25 in total

1.  Early treadmill testing after myocardial infarction: Angiographic and hemodynamic correlations.

Authors:  P H Dillahunt; A B Miller
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  The complications of coronary arteriography.

Authors:  D F Adams; D B Fraser; H L Abrams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Relation between the precordial projection of S-T segment changes after exercise and coronary angiographic findings.

Authors:  K M Fox; A Selwyn; D Oakley; J P Shillingford
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  A method for praecordial surface mapping of the exercise electrocardiogram.

Authors:  K M Fox; A P Selwyn; J P Shillingford
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1978-12

5.  Comparison of S-T segment changes on exercise testing with angiographic findings in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M J Castellanet; P S Greenberg; M H Ellestad
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Five-year survival of 728 patients after myocardial infarction. A community study.

Authors:  S Pohjola; P Siltanen; M Romo
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1980-02

7.  Symptom-limited vs heart-rate-limited exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R F DeBusk; W Haskell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Predictors of clinical course, coronary anatomy and left ventricular function after recovery from acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G J Taylor; J O Humphries; E D Mellits; B Pitt; R A Schulze; L S Griffith; S C Achuff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prediction of multivessel disease after inferior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B R Chaitman; D D Waters; F Corbara; M G Bourassa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Submaximal exercise testing early after myocardial infarction. Difficulty of predicting coronary anatomy and left ventricular performance.

Authors:  I D Sullivan; D W Davies; E Sowton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Use of the maximal ST/HR slope to estimate myocardial ischaemia after recent myocardial infarction.

Authors:  N Bishop; G Hart; R M Boyle; J B Stoker; D R Smith; D A Mary
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-06

Review 2.  Coronary thrombolysis.

Authors:  D de Bono
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-04

3.  Relative power of clinical, exercise test, and angiographic variables in predicting clinical outcome after myocardial infarction: the Newham and Tower Hamlets study.

Authors:  M A de Belder; C W Pumphrey; J D Skehan; H Rimington; B al Wakeel; S J Evans; M Rothman; P G Mills
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.