Literature DB >> 10409536

Prognostic value of symptom limited versus low level exercise stress test before discharge in patients with myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytics.

K Jensen-Urstad1, B A Samad, F Bouvier, J Hulting, J Höjer, H Ruiz, M Jensen-Urstad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of symptom limited exercise testing versus low level exercise testing soon after a thrombolytic treated acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: 98 patients (71 men, 27 women), mean (SD) age 64 (9) years (range 45-75 years), were investigated 5-8 days after admittance to hospital. An ergometer cycle test was used, starting at 30 W with 10 W increments per minute. Each exercise test was interpreted at the symptom limited end point and a low level end point, which was defined as the point at which the patient rated exhaustion as 13 on the 6-20 point Borg scale for rating perceived exertion.
SETTING: A university hospital.
RESULTS: 75 of the 98 patients were able to perform a predischarge exercise test. Of the remaining 23 patients who could not perform an early exercise test (because of unstable angina, heart failure, or thrombus detected at echocardiography), five died or had a myocardial infarction and six underwent bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) during a follow up period of one year. There were no complications related to the symptom limited exercise tests. The test results were positive in 15 patients at the low level end point and in 39 patients (p < 0.001) at the symptom limited end point. During a follow up period of one year, six of the 75 patients died or had a myocardial infarction. Two of these six patients had a positive low level exercise test and four had a positive symptom limited exercise test. Twenty three of the 75 patients who performed an exercise test had a cardiac event within one year (death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery or PTCA); of these, 19 had a positive symptom limited exercise test and nine had a positive low level exercise test (p = 0.025). Four of the 36 patients with a negative symptom limited test suffered cardiac events within a year (two patients had a myocardial infarction and two had bypass surgery).
CONCLUSION: Symptom limited exercise testing soon after thrombolytically treated myocardial infarction will identify more patients with exercise induced ST depression or chest pain than a low level test, and seems safe. A negative symptom limited test has a better negative predictive value (11% risk of an event within a year) than a negative low level (25% risk of an event within a year).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10409536      PMCID: PMC1729143          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.82.2.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  10 in total

1.  Symptom-limited versus low level exercise testing before hospital discharge after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M Juneau; P Colles; P Théroux; P de Guise; G Pelletier; J Lam; D Waters
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  An echocardiographic study of the fluid mechanics of obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  M V Sherrid; C K Chu; E Delia; A Mogtader; E M Dwyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  A metaanalysis of predischarge risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction with stress electrocardiographic, myocardial perfusion, and ventricular function imaging.

Authors:  L J Shaw; E D Peterson; K Kesler; V Hasselblad; R M Califf
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Risk stratification in patients with first non-Q wave infarction: limited value of the early low level exercise test after uncomplicated infarcts. The Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group.

Authors:  R J Krone; E M Dwyer; H Greenberg; J P Miller; J A Gillespie
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Symptom-limited vs heart-rate-limited exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R F DeBusk; W Haskell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Prognostic importance of predischarge exercise capacity for long-term mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction in patients admitted for suspected acute myocardial infarction and treated with metoprolol.

Authors:  P K Rønnevik; G von der Lippe
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Reassessment of treadmill stress testing for risk stratification in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis.

Authors:  R Stevenson; V Umachandran; K Ranjadayalan; P Wilkinson; B Marchant; A D Timmis
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-11

8.  Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s--their risk factors, stratification and survival in Canada: the Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Study.

Authors:  J L Rouleau; M Talajic; B Sussex; L Potvin; W Warnica; R F Davies; M Gardner; D Stewart; S Plante; R Dupuis; C Lauzon; J Ferguson; E Mikes; V Balnozan; P Savard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prognostic significance of maximal exercise testing after myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents: the GISSI-2 data-base. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza Nell'Infarto.

Authors:  A Villella; A P Maggioni; M Villella; A Giordano; F M Turazza; E Santoro; M G Franzosi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Impact of treatment strategy on predischarge exercise test in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II Trial.

Authors:  B R Chaitman; R P McMahon; M Terrin; L T Younis; L J Shaw; D A Weiner; M M Frederick; G L Knatterud; G Sopko; E Braunwald
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.