Literature DB >> 7353451

Comparison of the one-gram d-[14C]xylose breath test to the [14C]bile acid breath test in patients with small-intestine bacterial overgrowth.

C E King, P P Toskes, T R Guilarte, E Lorenz, S L Welkos.   

Abstract

In twelve patients with culture-proven bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine, the ability of a newly-developed one-gram d-[14C]xylose breath test to detect bacterial overgrowth was compared to that of the [14C]bile acid breath test. All patients manifested excessive production of breath 14CO2 after the administration of one gram [14C]xylose, with 83% of the patients being abnormal within the first hour of testing. In contrast, during the [14C]bile acid breath test, four of the twelve patients had no period of excessive 14CO2 production (above the 95% confidence range of controls). Nutrient malabsorption (fat, cobalamin, xylose) was seen with both true-positive and false-negative bile acid breath tests. The one gram [14C]xylose breath test, utilizing a substrate with more predominant absorption in the proximal small intestine and which can be catabolized by Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, appears to have a greater degree of sensitivity and specificity than the bile acid breath test in detecting the presence of small-intestine bacterial overgrowth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7353451     DOI: 10.1007/bf01312733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  23 in total

1.  Analyzer for accurate estimation of respiratory gases in one-half cubic centimeter samples.

Authors:  P F SCHOLANDER
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1947-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Modification of bile acids by intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  R Lewis; S Gorbach
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1972-10

3.  Small intestine bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  C E King; P P Toskes
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Clinical experience with a simple test for the detection of bacterial deconjugation of bile salts and the site and extent of bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine.

Authors:  G Egger; J I Kessler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Kinetics of CO2-HCO3 minus in normal adult males.

Authors:  H S Winchell; H Stahelin; N Kusubov; B Slanger; M Fish; M Pollycove; J H Lawrence
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Detection of bacterial deconjugation of bile salts by a convenient breath-analysis technic.

Authors:  H P Sherr; Y Sasaki; A Newman; J G Banwell; H N Wagner; T R Hendrix
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Value of small intestinal bile acid analysis in the diagnosis of the stagnant loop syndrome.

Authors:  T C Northfield; B S Drasar; J T Wright
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Sensitivity of bile acid breath test in the diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine with and without the stagnant (blind) loop syndrome.

Authors:  S Farivar; H Fromm; D Schindler; F W Schmidt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Appraisal of the 14C-glycocholate acid test with special reference to the measurement of faecal 14C excretion.

Authors:  J H Scarpello; G E Sladen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Clinical value of the bile acid breath test. Evaluation of the Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  B H Lauterburg; A D Newcomer; A F Hofmann
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  10 in total

1.  Small Bowel Bacterial Overgrowth: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Virmeet V. Singh; Phillip P. Toskes
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-02

2.  A new simple test for evaluation of intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  M Takahashi; Y Maeda; H Tashiro; T Eto; T Goto; O Sanada
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  A systematic review of diagnostic tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  Reza Khoshini; Sun-Chuan Dai; Sheila Lezcano; Mark Pimentel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Malabsorption testing: a review.

Authors:  P M Ginsburg; P Janefalkar; D T Rubin; E D Ehrenpreis
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-10

5.  Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Andrew C Dukowicz; Brian E Lacy; Gary M Levine
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-02

Review 6.  Evaluation of small bowel bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  Lawrence R Schiller
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-10

7.  Gastrointestinal function in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  A Akesson; B Akesson; T Gustafson; F Wollheim
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Use of the conjugate of disulphated ursodeoxycholic acid with p-aminobenzoic acid for the detection of intestinal bacteria.

Authors:  M Takahashi; T Konishi; Y Maeda; Y Matsugu; F Akazawa; T Eto; M Okajima; K Uchida; Y Masaoka; K Okada
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Increased accuracy of the carbon-14 D-xylose breath test in detecting small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth by correction with the gastric emptying rate.

Authors:  C S Chang; G H Chen; C H Kao; S J Wang; S N Peng; C K Huang; S K Poon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-10

Review 10.  Small bowel bacterial overgrowth: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Virmeet V Singh; Phillip P Toskes
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.