Literature DB >> 8542894

Increased accuracy of the carbon-14 D-xylose breath test in detecting small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth by correction with the gastric emptying rate.

C S Chang1, G H Chen, C H Kao, S J Wang, S N Peng, C K Huang, S K Poon.   

Abstract

To date, there is no general agreement as to which test is to be preferred for the diagnosis of small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth. The 1-g carbon-14 D-xylose breath test has been proposed as a very sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth. However, in patients with severe gastrointestinal motor dysfunction, the lack of consistent delivery of 14C-D-xylose to the region of bacterial contamination may result in a "negative" result. The aim of this study was to determine whether the accuracy of 14C-D-xylose breath test for detecting bacterial overgrowth can be increased by correction with the gastric emptying rate of 14C-D-xylose. Ten culture-positive patients and ten culture-negative controls were included in the study. Small-intestinal aspirates for bacteriological culture were obtained endoscopically. A liquid-phase gastric emptying study was performed simultaneously to assess the amount of 14C-D-xylose that entered the small intestine. The results of the percentage of expired 14CO2 at 30 min were corrected with the amount of 14C-D-xylose that entered the small intestine. There were six patients in the culture-positive group with a 14CO2 concentration above the normal limit. Three out of four patients with initially negative results using the uncorrected method proved to be positive after correction. All these three patients had prolonged gastric emptying of 14C-D-xylose. When compared with cultures of small-intestine aspirates, the sensitivity and specificity of the uncorrected 14C-D-xylose breath test were 60% and 90%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of the corrected 14C-D-xylose breath test improved to 90% and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, using the gastric emptying rate of 14C-D-xylose as a correcting factor, we found a higher sensitivity and specificity for the 14C-D-xylose breath test in the detection of small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth than were achieved with the conventional method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8542894     DOI: 10.1007/bf00800592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  15 in total

1.  Detection of small intestine bacterial overgrowth by means of a 14C-D-xylose breath test.

Authors:  C E King; P P Toskes; J C Spivey; E Lorenz; S Welkos
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  D-xylose testing: a review.

Authors:  R M Craig; A J Atkinson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Abnormalities in proximal small bowel motility in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  J Chesta; C Defilippi; C Defilippi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  The interdigestive motor complex of normal subjects and patients with bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine.

Authors:  G Vantrappen; J Janssens; J Hellemans; Y Ghoos
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Evidence for hypomotility in non-ulcer dyspepsia: a prospective multifactorial study.

Authors:  B Waldron; P T Cullen; R Kumar; D Smith; J Jankowski; D Hopwood; D Sutton; N Kennedy; F C Campbell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Comparison of the one-gram d-[14C]xylose breath test to the [14C]bile acid breath test in patients with small-intestine bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  C E King; P P Toskes; T R Guilarte; E Lorenz; S L Welkos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Reduced accuracy of 14C-D-xylose breath test for detecting bacterial overgrowth in gastrointestinal motility disorders.

Authors:  M A Valdovinos; M Camilleri; G M Thomforde; C Frie
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Comparison of the 1-gram [14C]xylose, 10-gram lactulose-H2, and 80-gram glucose-H2 breath tests in patients with small intestine bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  C E King; P P Toskes
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Value of the 14C-D-xylose breath test in patients with intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  A Schneider; B Novis; V Chen; G Leichtman
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine. Comparison of the 14C-D-xylose breath test and jejunal cultures in 60 patients.

Authors:  J J Rumessen; E Gudmand-Høyer; E Bachmann; T Justesen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  5 in total

1.  Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea, 2nd edition.

Authors:  P D Thomas; A Forbes; J Green; P Howdle; R Long; R Playford; M Sheridan; R Stevens; R Valori; J Walters; G M Addison; P Hill; G Brydon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  A systematic review of diagnostic tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  Reza Khoshini; Sun-Chuan Dai; Sheila Lezcano; Mark Pimentel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Andrew C Dukowicz; Brian E Lacy; Gary M Levine
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-02

Review 4.  Evaluation of small bowel bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  Lawrence R Schiller
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-10

5.  Predisposing factors for positive D-Xylose breath test for evaluation of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a retrospective study of 932 patients.

Authors:  Richard A Schatz; Qing Zhang; Nilesh Lodhia; Jonathan Shuster; Phillip P Toskes; Baharak Moshiree
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.