Literature DB >> 633950

Clinical value of the bile acid breath test. Evaluation of the Mayo Clinic experience.

B H Lauterburg, A D Newcomer, A F Hofmann.   

Abstract

The Mayo Clinic experience with more than 200 bile acid breath tests was analyzed retrospectively to assess its clinical value. In patients with suspected bacterial overgrowth, the result of the bile acid breath test was compared with that of culture of aspirates of small bowel, and the test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.90 (1.0 highest possible value). Although in one-third of the patients with a positive small-bowel culture the bile acid breath test failed to demonstrate the presence of bacterial overgrowth, analysis of the data according to the Bayes theorem showed that, compared with a routine evaluation without a small-bowel culture, the availability of breath test results will double the probability with which the clinician can be certain about the presence or absence of bacterial overgrowth. The test result appeared to influence the diagnosis in 83% and the management in 74% of the 163 patients in whom it was performed because of suspected bacterial overgrowth. In patients with suspected malabsorption of bile acids, on the other hand, the test that was performed without determination of fecal bile acid excretion appeared to be rather insensitive, and only rarely was information gained that was not already known from a routine workup of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 633950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  11 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of diagnostic tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  Reza Khoshini; Sun-Chuan Dai; Sheila Lezcano; Mark Pimentel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Bile salt tests in clinical practice.

Authors:  K W Heaton
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-03-10

Review 3.  Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth syndrome.

Authors:  Jan Bures; Jiri Cyrany; Darina Kohoutova; Miroslav Förstl; Stanislav Rejchrt; Jaroslav Kvetina; Viktor Vorisek; Marcela Kopacova
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Evaluation of small bowel bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  Lawrence R Schiller
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-10

5.  Gastrointestinal function in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  A Akesson; B Akesson; T Gustafson; F Wollheim
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Intragastric nitrites, nitrosamines, and bacterial overgrowth during cimetidine treatment.

Authors:  R W Stockbrugger; P B Cotton; N Eugenides; B A Bartholomew; M J Hill; C L Walters
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency from stool fat and weight.

Authors:  G E Feurle; W Morgenstern; H Pfaff
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1983-02-15

8.  Sensitivity of bile acid breath test in the diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine with and without the stagnant (blind) loop syndrome.

Authors:  S Farivar; H Fromm; D Schindler; F W Schmidt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Comparison of the one-gram d-[14C]xylose breath test to the [14C]bile acid breath test in patients with small-intestine bacterial overgrowth.

Authors:  C E King; P P Toskes; T R Guilarte; E Lorenz; S L Welkos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Biliary sequelae of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  C Greenfield; P Cleland; R Dick; S Masters; J A Summerfield; S Sherlock
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.