Literature DB >> 7316868

Development of surface-recorded cochlear and early neural potentials in the cat.

E Laukli, I W Mair.   

Abstract

The development of the surface-recorded cochlear and early neural potentials has been studied in the cat from birth to the 8th post-natal week. CM, SP, and each of the neural waves has a characteristic temporal developmental pattern and mature threshold. Wave IV is the most resistant to reduction in stimulus intensity levels, while the thresholds of both cochlear potentials are high. Animals with hereditary unilateral deafness constitute a most convenient model for the study of functional maturation in the auditory pathways, particularly with regard to precise latency estimations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7316868     DOI: 10.1007/bf00464268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  29 in total

1.  Bilateral recording of early auditory evoked responses in the cat.

Authors:  I W Mair; H H Elverland; E Laukli
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Short-latency auditory evoked responses recorded from human nasopharynx.

Authors:  J L Martin; A C Coats
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Cochlear microphonic responses to pure tones in man recorded by a non-surgical method.

Authors:  N Yoshie; K Yamaura
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1969

4.  Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings.

Authors:  L J Achor; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02

5.  Comparison of brain stem auditory evoked potentials for monaural and binaural stimuli.

Authors:  P J Ainslie; J R Boston
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-08

6.  Brain stem auditory evoked response development in the kitten.

Authors:  C Shipley; J S Buchwald; R Norman; D Guthrie
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-01-27       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Comparison of earlobe and promontorium recording sites in electrocochleography.

Authors:  D Cohen; H Sohmer
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec

8.  Recording of the cochlear microphonic potential with surface electrodes.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03

9.  Brainstem responses to tone pip and click stimuli.

Authors:  C D Bauch; D E Rose; S G Harner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Evoked potential correlates of genetic progressive hearing loss. Age-related changes from the ear to the inferior colliculus of C57BL/6 and CBA/J mice.

Authors:  K R Henry; C M Lepkowski
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  1 in total

1.  Remotely recorded cochlear microphonic in the cat.

Authors:  E Laukli; I W Mair
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1983
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.