Literature DB >> 6882278

Remotely recorded cochlear microphonic in the cat.

E Laukli, I W Mair.   

Abstract

The cochlear microphonic (CM) was recorded differentially with subcutaneous electrodes at the vertex and a variety of positions on the head and neck of the cat, and the phase and amplitude were compared with simultaneous recordings from vertex and contralateral ear electrodes. Recordings were made in bilaterally hearing animals, both with and without ear canal occlusion, following unilateral labyrinthectomy, and in white-coat cats with hereditary unilateral deafness, and in different age-groups. The cochlear microphonic was in phase with the contralateral recording at all electrode sites except those in the immediate vicinity of the stimulus ear. The amplitude was less at the circumaural positions and greater at cervical locations. The results were consistent in all age-groups and in bilaterally and unilaterally hearing animals. Precise electrode placement in the near-field conditions around the stimulus ear is therefore critical, especially for phase, while far-field conditions would appear to predominate at the remaining electrode sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6882278     DOI: 10.1007/bf00453737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  17 in total

1.  Problems of cochlear microphonic recording in man.

Authors:  M Hoke
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1976-11

2.  The excitatory process in the cochlea.

Authors:  H DAVIS; C FERNANDEZ; D R McAULIFFE
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bilateral recording of early auditory evoked responses in the cat.

Authors:  I W Mair; H H Elverland; E Laukli
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Can we use the cochlear microphonic in electrocochleography.

Authors:  H A Beagley
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1974 Jul-Aug

5.  Far-field cochlear microphonic responses to continuous pure tones recorded from the scalps of cats.

Authors:  V L Schwent; D L Jewett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-05

6.  Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings.

Authors:  L J Achor; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02

7.  Spatial distribution of brainstem auditory evoked potentials and their alterations in lesions of the VIIIth nerve and brainstem.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; Y Ishiyama; S Manaka; M Ebe; K Sano
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.448

8.  Experimental ABR studies.

Authors:  I W Mair; E Laukli; H H Elverland
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1981

9.  Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; M Feinmesser
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Recording of the cochlear microphonic potential with surface electrodes.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.