Literature DB >> 6158405

Comparison of brain stem auditory evoked potentials for monaural and binaural stimuli.

P J Ainslie, J R Boston.   

Abstract

This study examined the relation of brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) for monaural and binaural click stimuli. Responses were recorded from normal subjects for 4 stimulus levels of 50, 70, 90 and 110 dB peSPL peak-to-peak, corresponding to monaural sensation levels of 7, 27, 47 and 67 dB SL. Wave amplitude and latency values were analyzed for the effects of the binaural stimulus condition. Responses to binaural stimuli were compared to the summed responses to monaural stimuli to estimate binaural interactions. The results show that responses to a binaural stimulus have significantly greater wave amplitudes than responses to a monaural stimulus. If a response to a binaural stimulus is compared to the sum of the responses to the corresponding monaural stimuli, however, there are no significant differences in wave V amplitudes. Latency values are equal for the two stimulus conditions. Calculations of a continuous wave form representing the difference (point-by-point) between the response to a binaural stimulus and the summed response to the two monaural stimuli shows that significant binaural interactions occur with a latency of 7-10 msec. Additional interactions occur with a latency of 12-16 msec. Although neural and sonomotor sources may contribute to these short latency binaural interactions, acoustic cross-talk appears to account for a significant portion of the observed interaction.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6158405     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90223-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  6 in total

1.  [On the relation between binaural difference potentials and directional hearing].

Authors:  S Hoth; M Benz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Effects of an expanding supratentorial mass on the auditory brain-stem responses in baboons.

Authors:  T Tsutsui; M Nitta; A Ladds; L Symon
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Development of surface-recorded cochlear and early neural potentials in the cat.

Authors:  E Laukli; I W Mair
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1981

Review 4.  The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Alexander T Ferber; Georg M Klump; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Gender differences in binaural speech-evoked auditory brainstem response: are they clinically significant?

Authors:  Bahram Jalaei; Mohd Hafiz Afifi Mohd Azmi; Mohd Normani Zakaria
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.