Literature DB >> 3189974

Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradaic and capacitor electrodes.

D B McCreery1, W F Agnew, T G Yuen, L A Bullara.   

Abstract

Arrays of platinum (faradaic) and anodized, sintered tantalum pentoxide (capacitor) electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the subdural space of the parietal cortex of the cat. Two weeks after implantation both types of electrodes were pulsed for seven hours with identical waveforms consisting of controlled-current, charge-balanced, symmetric, anodic-first pulse pairs, 400 microseconds/phase and a charge density of 80-100 microC/cm2 (microcoulombs per square cm) at 50 pps (pulses per second). One group of animals was sacrificed immediately following stimulation and a second smaller group one week after stimulation. Tissues beneath both types of pulsed electrodes were damaged, but the difference in damage for the two electrode types was not statistically significant. Tissue beneath unpulsed electrodes was normal. At the ultrastructural level, in animals killed immediately after stimulation, shrunken and hyperchromic neurons were intermixed with neurons showing early intracellular edema. Glial cells appeared essentially normal. In animals killed one week after stimulation most of the damaged neurons had recovered, but the presence of shrunken, vacuolated and degenerating neurons showed that some of the cells were damaged irreversibly. It is concluded that most of the neural damage from stimulations of the brain surface at the level used in this study derives from processes associated with passage of the stimulus current through tissue, such as neuronal hyperactivity rather than electrochemical reactions associated with current injection across the electrode-tissue interface, since such reactions occur only with the faradaic electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3189974     DOI: 10.1007/bf02368010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  28 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the brain. III. The neural damage model.

Authors:  R H Pudenz; L A Bullara; S Jacques; F T Hambrecht
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: II-estimation of maximum surface redox (theoretical non-gassing) limits.

Authors:  S B Brummer; M J Turner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  W F Agnew; D B McCreery
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Intracellular calcium deposition in brain following electrical stimulation.

Authors:  W F Agnew; T G Yuen; L A Bullara; D Jacques; R H Pudenz
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.448

5.  Effects of electrical stimulation of brain.

Authors:  R H Pudenz; W F Agnew; L A Bullara
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VII. Dissolution of Pt electrodes during electrical stimulation of the cat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  L S Robblee; J McHardy; W F Agnew; L A Bullara
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Intracortical capacitor electrodes: preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  E M Schmidt; F T Hambrecht; J S McIntosh
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Deleterious effects of prolonged electrical excitation of striate cortex in macaques.

Authors:  J R Bartlett; R W Doty; B B Lee; N Negrão; W H Overman
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Preparation of etched tantalum semimicro capacitor stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  L S Robblee; E M Kelliher; M E Langmuir; H Vartanian; J McHardy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1983-03

10.  Blood flow compensates oxygen demand in the vulnerable CA3 region of the hippocampus during kainate-induced seizures.

Authors:  E Pinard; E Tremblay; Y Ben-Ari; J Seylaz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  35 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation causes rapid changes in electrode impedance of cell-covered electrodes.

Authors:  Carrie Newbold; Rachael Richardson; Rodney Millard; Peter Seligman; Robert Cowan; Robert Shepherd
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Combined KHFAC + DC nerve block without onset or reduced nerve conductivity after block.

Authors:  Manfred Franke; Tina Vrabec; Jesse Wainright; Niloy Bhadra; Narendra Bhadra; Kevin Kilgore
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Intraocular retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  M S Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

4.  Characterization of high capacitance electrodes for the application of direct current electrical nerve block.

Authors:  Tina Vrabec; Niloy Bhadra; Jesse Wainright; Narendra Bhadra; Manfred Franke; Kevin Kilgore
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Impact of brain tissue filtering on neurostimulation fields: a modeling study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Uri Eden; Jarrett Rushmore; Christopher J Russo; Laura Dipietro; Felipe Fregni; Stephen Simon; Stephen Rotman; Naomi B Pitskel; Ciro Ramos-Estebanez; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Alan J Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Design and evaluation of a personal digital assistant-based research platform for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Hussnain Ali; Arthur P Lobo; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Scott H Greenwald; James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Neural electrode degradation from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of sputtered and activated iridium oxide.

Authors:  Sandeep Negi; Rajmohan Bhandari; Loren Rieth; Rick Van Wagenen; Florian Solzbacher
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Analysis of high-perimeter planar electrodes for efficient neural stimulation.

Authors:  Xuefeng F Wei; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.