Literature DB >> 7294266

Second consultant opinion for elective orthopedic surgery.

E G McCarthy, M L Finkel.   

Abstract

We abstracted records of 369 patients whose recommendations for elective orthopedic surgery were not confirmed by a second opinion consultant. Six months or more after the initial recommendation for surgery, 82 per cent had not had the operation performed, irrespective of the diagnosis and the characteristics of the physician recommending surgery. Reasons for consultant non-confirmation included: use of a cast, brace, or corrective footwear preferable (26.3 per cent), symptoms not severe enough (18.4 per cent), and physical therapy/exercises preferable (17.8 per cent).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7294266      PMCID: PMC1619903          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.71.11.1233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  Effects of screening by consultants on recommended elective surgical procedures.

Authors:  E G McCarthy; G W Widmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The Elective Surgery Second Opinion Program.

Authors:  W R Grafe; C K McSherry; M L Finkel; E G McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Second opinion elective surgery programs: outcome status over time.

Authors:  E G McCarthy; M L Finkel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  In defence of the meniscus. A prospective study of 200 meniscectomy patients.

Authors:  J Noble; K Erat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1980-02

5.  Surgical decision making. The reliability of clinical judgment.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A M Gittelsohn; G D Zuidema
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Second consultant opinion for elective gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  E G McCarthy; M L Finkel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 7.661

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Do first opinions affect second opinions?

Authors:  Geva Vashitz; Joseph S Pliskin; Yisrael Parmet; Yona Kosashvili; Gal Ifergane; Shlomo Wientroub; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Second opinion behaviour among Japanese primary care patients.

Authors:  T Sato; M Takeichi; T Hara; S Koizumi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel.

Authors:  Liora Shmueli; Nadav Davidovitch; Joseph S Pliskin; Ran D Balicer; Igal Hekselman; Geva Greenfield
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-12-08

4.  The behaviors of seeking a second opinion from other health-care professionals and the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine in gynecologic cancer patients.

Authors:  K F Tam; D K L Cheng; T Y Ng; H Y S Ngan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Values and risks of second opinion in Japan's universal health-care system.

Authors:  Sawako Okamoto; Kazuo Kawahara; Atsushi Okawa; Yujiro Tanaka
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Second opinion utilization by healthcare insurance type in a mixed private-public healthcare system: a population-based study.

Authors:  Liora Shmueli; Erez Shmueli; Joseph S Pliskin; Ran D Balicer; Nadav Davidovitch; Igal Hekselman; Geva Greenfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Orthopedic surgeons' and neurologists' attitudes towards second opinions in the Israeli healthcare system: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Geva Greenfield; Joseph S Pliskin; Shlomo Wientroub; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2012-07-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.