Literature DB >> 23409806

Values and risks of second opinion in Japan's universal health-care system.

Sawako Okamoto1, Kazuo Kawahara1, Atsushi Okawa2, Yujiro Tanaka3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Second opinion (SO) is widely recognized in Japan, but we do not know how patients view and use SO.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate optimum seeking of SO in Japan's universal health-care system. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND METHODS: Survey of patients at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital. Of 365 responses, 67 had experienced SO with standardized protocol at SO Clinic; 82 had obtained SO elsewhere without instruction; 216 had never sought SO. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Views of values and risks of SO.
RESULTS: Second opinion patients with standardized protocol better understood their illness, treatment options, individualized plan, and uncertainty in medicine, and also reported improved decision making compared with SO patients without the protocol (P < 0.05). However, more than half of respondents misunderstood SO as a way to change doctors or treatment. Second opinion respondents (n = 149) had a propensity to request treatment changes (P < 0.1) and more than one-third (n = 82) did not tell SO doctor they were being treated by another doctor. The absolute majority of non-SO patients would seek SO for a serious illness but would hesitate to tell their doctors. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Respondents recognized value of SO to improve understanding and decision making. This study also found risks in SO misuse which may be reinforced by Japan's cultural tendencies and universal health-care system. Our findings suggest steps to increase the benefit of SO: ensure involvement of original doctor, instruct patients about SO and help them organize their thinking before SO and facilitate patients' return to the treating doctor for discussion and decision making.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; decision-making; quality of care; risk; second opinion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23409806      PMCID: PMC5060883          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  21 in total

1.  Second consultant opinion for elective orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  E G McCarthy; M L Finkel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The role of doctor's opinion in shared decision making: what does shared decision making really mean when considering invasive medical procedures?

Authors:  Dennis J Mazur; David H Hickam; Marcus D Mazur; Matthew D Mazur
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Results of the Lynn Sage Second-Opinion Program for local therapy in patients with breast carcinoma. Changes in management and determinants of where care is delivered.

Authors:  Jennifer Clauson; Y C Hsieh; Simbi Acharya; Alfred W Rademaker; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine.

Authors:  J Bensing
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2000-01

Review 5.  Seeking a second opinion: do patients need a second opinion when practice guidelines exist?

Authors:  Nora Moumjid; Amiram Gafni; Alain Bremond; Marie-Odile Carrere
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  An analysis of nonconfirmation rates. Experiences of a surgical second opinion program.

Authors:  M Paris; E Salsberg; L Berenson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-11-30       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Patients' reactions and physician-patient communication in a mandatory surgical second-opinion program.

Authors:  S N Rosenberg; S A Gorman; S Snitzer; E V Herbst; D Lynne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Cancer patients seeking a second surgical opinion: results of a study on motives, needs, and expectations.

Authors:  W A M Mellink; A M V Dulmen; Th Wiggers; P M M Spreeuwenberg; A M M Eggermont; J M Bensing
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Results of a second-opinion program for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  T B Graboys; A Headley; B Lown; S Lampert; C M Blatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Doctor-shopping patients and users of alternative medicine among Japanese primary care patients.

Authors:  T Sato; M Takeichi; M Shirahama; T Fukui; J K Gude
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.238

View more
  2 in total

1.  The market landscape of online second opinion services for spine surgery.

Authors:  Brian V Lien; Nolan J Brown; Sandra Gattas; Elliot H Choi; Ronald Sahyouni; Jessica K Campos; Angie Zhang; Michael Y Oh
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-10-29

2.  Outcome Assessment for a Telemedicine-Based Second Opinion Program for Midwest China.

Authors:  Ayan Mao; Yueli Meng; Qing Wang; Enhuan Du; Pei Dong; Xiaoling Yan; Kun Wang; Yujie Yang; Guangyu Hu; Wuqi Qiu
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.