Literature DB >> 713632

Second opinion elective surgery programs: outcome status over time.

E G McCarthy, M L Finkel.   

Abstract

Given the increasing rate of surgery and the escalating costs of hospitalization, it seems appropriate to review the necessity of recommended elective surgery before the surgery is performed. The second opinion elective surgery program is designed to screen patients before they undergo surgery. Findings are based on all not confirmed for surgery cases and an equal number of confirmed for surgery cases who were evaluated one year after their second opinion consultation. Roughly 77.9% of those not confirmed had not had the surgery and, of this, 64.4% reported no medical treatment (potential surplus surgery). Of the 710 not confirmed cases, one third (34.9%) never reported receiving medical treatment. The majority of those individuals confirmed for surgery did have the operation; however, 25.4% had not had surgery one year from their consultation. Thirty-two per cent of the confirmed cases reported never receiving medical treatment. There were 77 individuals (11.1%) who were confirmed for surgery who neither reported having surgery nor any medical treatment (population at risk). Subsequent follow up studies will present a clearer assessment of the ability of the program to screen potential surplus surgery and to realize cost savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 713632     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-197812000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  Unnecessary surgery.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Quality measurement and control in physician decision making: state of the art.

Authors:  O W Anderson; M C Shields
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Third party cost containment and the physician-patient relationship: a case study.

Authors:  G A Goldberg; W Greenberg
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1982

4.  Measuring surgical decision-making with hypothetical cases.

Authors:  E Vayda; W R Mindell; C B Mueller; B Yaffe
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Second consultant opinion for elective orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  E G McCarthy; M L Finkel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Surgical decision making. The reliability of clinical judgment.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A M Gittelsohn; G D Zuidema
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Outcome Assessment for a Telemedicine-Based Second Opinion Program for Midwest China.

Authors:  Ayan Mao; Yueli Meng; Qing Wang; Enhuan Du; Pei Dong; Xiaoling Yan; Kun Wang; Yujie Yang; Guangyu Hu; Wuqi Qiu
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.