Literature DB >> 7284926

Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in a Canadian teaching hospital.

W M Thurlbeck.   

Abstract

Two hundred autopsies were investigated to determine the correlation between the clinical and pathological diagnoses in three categories--major underlying disease, cause of death and significant incidental pulmonary findings. There was concurrence in diagnosis of the major underlying disease in 76% of cases, with 12% of disagreements being considered minor and 12% major. In only three cases might different management have affected the outcome had the correct diagnosis of the major underlying disease been made during life. There was concurrence of the diagnosis of the cause of death (which was often different from the underlying disease) in 64% of cases, and in 10% of cases the outcome might have been different had the clinical diagnosis been accurate. The clinical opinion that lung disease was the cause of death was confirmed at autopsy in 54% of cases, and 45% of the pulmonary causes of death as determined at autopsy had been recognized clinically. Major incidental pulmonary findings diagnosed clinically were confirmed in 76% of cases, and major pulmonary findings diagnosed at autopsy had been recognized clinically in 83%. The major sources of these discrepancies were pulmonary embolism and pneumonia. If autopsies are to play a role in patient management, clinicians will have to be made aware of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis. The real test of efficacy would be modification of patient management for the good.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7284926      PMCID: PMC1862466     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  8 in total

1.  Necropsy rates in the United Birmingham Hospitals.

Authors:  H A Waldron; L Vickerstaff
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-05-10

2.  Trends in hospital necropsy rates: Scotland 1961-74.

Authors:  H M Cameron; E McGoogan; J Clarke; B A Wilson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-06-18

3.  Letter: Nationwide review of autopsy utility suggested.

Authors:  R D Paegle; L Kiefer; M Sharma
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Diagnostic errors discovered at autopsy.

Authors:  M Britton
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1974-09

5.  The necropsy as a tool in medical progress.

Authors:  E A Gall
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1968-07

6.  Medical center autopsy costs.

Authors:  R Yesner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses.

Authors:  H M Cameron; E McGoogan; H Watson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-11

8.  The postmortem examination. Scientific necessity or folly?

Authors:  S Burrows
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-08-04       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Missed diagnosis in hematological patients-an autopsy study.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Galtarossa Xavier; Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira; Luciano José Megale Costa; Thais Mauad; Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Audit of necropsies in a British district general hospital.

Authors:  M D Harris; J W Blundell
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Assessing the autopsy.

Authors:  P N Nemetz; J Ludwig; L T Kurland
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Correlation between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a community hospital.

Authors:  J Gough
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1985-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Clinical diagnosis: a post-mortem assessment of accuracy in the 1980s.

Authors:  J Mercer; I C Talbot
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies.

Authors:  T N Gibson; S E Shirley; C T Escoffery; M Reid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The autopsy: its role in the evaluation of patient care.

Authors:  L L Pelletier; F Klutzow; H Lancaster
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Closing the Loop: Facilitating the Use of Autopsy Information in Medical Decision Making and Managed Care.

Authors:  Peter N Nemetz
Journal:  Biomed Inform Insights       Date:  2008-07-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.