Literature DB >> 2760699

The autopsy: its role in the evaluation of patient care.

L L Pelletier1, F Klutzow, H Lancaster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether autopsies improve the detection of major clinical errors.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of all deaths for a 30-month period to detect major clinical errors when a correct diagnosis and institution of proper therapy would have prolonged the patient's life, with comparison of autopsied patients with those without an autopsy.
SETTING: Small government hospital inpatient medical service. PATIENTS: 335 consecutive deaths with 141 [42%] autopsies. MAIN
RESULTS: Review of the clinical records of cases without autopsy led to the discovery of only two major clinical errors [1%], whereas 19 major clinical errors [13%] were detected in autopsy cases. Three of the 19 errors in autopsy patients would have been detected by chart review alone. Thirteen of the 19 clinical errors in autopsied patients were related to infections that were missed or were not treated appropriately because of misdiagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Autopsies continue to reveal unanticipated and important information that is essential for internal medicine residency training and for the evaluation of the quality of medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2760699     DOI: 10.1007/BF02597401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  19 in total

1.  Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital.

Authors:  C S Landefeld; M M Chren; A Myers; R Geller; S Robbins; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Autopsy study of the elderly institutionalized patient. Review of 234 autopsies.

Authors:  J S Gross; R R Neufeld; L S Libow; I Gerber; M Rodstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-01

3.  Autopsy. A comprehensive review of current issues. Council on Scientific Affairs.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Mortui vivos docent.

Authors:  H Travers
Journal:  Kans Med       Date:  1986-12

5.  Autopsy rate in younger and older hospitalized patients.

Authors:  A Cocchi; F M Vecchio; M Pahor; L Antico; G Franceschini; G Farina; P U Carbonin
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Autopsy: moribund art or vital science?

Authors:  S J McPhee; K Bottles
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate.

Authors:  T Kircher; J Nelson; H Burdo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Age and the declining rate of autopsy.

Authors:  E W Campion; V A Reder; A G Mulley; G E Thibault
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Age trends in autopsy rates. Striking decline in late life.

Authors:  J C Ahronheim; A S Bernholc; W D Clark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses.

Authors:  R M Battle; D Pathak; C G Humble; C R Key; P R Vanatta; R B Hill; R E Anderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quality of care and maternal mortality in a tertiary-level hospital in Mozambique: a retrospective study of clinicopathological discrepancies.

Authors:  Clara Menéndez; Llorenç Quintó; Paola Castillo; Fabiola Fernandes; Carla Carrilho; Mamudo R Ismail; Cesaltina Lorenzoni; Juan Carlos Hurtado; Natalia Rakislova; Khátia Munguambe; Cinta Moraleda; Maria Maixenchs; Eusebio Macete; Inacio Mandomando; Miguel J Martínez; Pedro L Alonso; Quique Bassat; Jaume Ordi
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 26.763

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.