Literature DB >> 7271196

The results of cholecystectomy at a district general hospital. A reappraisal of operative cholangiography.

P G Reasbeck.   

Abstract

A total of 487 cholecystectomies were performed at one hospital over a 44-month period by surgeons who differed considerably in the frequency with which they performed operative cholangiography. There were no differences in the frequency or severity of postoperative complications or recurrent symptoms between patients who did and those who did not undergo operative cholangiography; nor were any differences demonstrable between patients operated on by different surgeons. Although it is established that operative cholangiography will demonstrate otherwise unsuspected common bile duct stones in some patients, it has not yet been clearly proved that these stones would cause later complications if left undisturbed. The clinical advantages of operative cholangiography are not sufficiently clear to preclude their assessment by prospective controlled studies involving large numbers of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7271196      PMCID: PMC2493836     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Operative cholangiography: a reappraisal based on a review of 400 cholangiograms.

Authors:  I Faris; J P Thomson; D J Grundy; L P Le Quesne
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Problems of retained and recurrent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  S W SMITH; C ENGEL; B AVERBOOK; W P LONGMIRE
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1957-05-18

3.  Routine operative cholangiography: an evaluation.

Authors:  L I NIENHUIS
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Operative cholangiography in the surgery of gallstones: implementation of a policy decision in a consecutive series of 327 patients.

Authors:  W Burnett; P M Bolton
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1972-08

5.  Operative cholangiography during routine cholecystectomy: a review of 3,012 cases.

Authors:  G S Kakos; R K Tompkins; W Turnipseed; R M Zollinger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1972-04

6.  Operative cholangiography: a case for its routine use.

Authors:  P C Jolly; J W Baker; H M Schmidt; J H Walker; J C Holm
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Routine operative cholangiography.

Authors:  B V McEvedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Operative cholangiography.

Authors:  C Havard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 6.939

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Selective use of operative cholangiography.

Authors:  J L Grogono; W G Woods
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  The elusive stone.

Authors:  P G Bevan
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-17

3.  Operative cholangiography.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Intraoperative cholangiography. A review of indications and analysis of age-sex groups.

Authors:  S B Levine; H J Lerner; E D Leifer; S R Lindheim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.