Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Operative cholangiography: a case for its routine use.

Literature DB >> 5675939

Operative cholangiography: a case for its routine use.

P C Jolly, J W Baker, H M Schmidt, J H Walker, J C Holm.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 1968 PMID： 5675939 PMCID： PMC1387364 DOI： 10.1097/00000658-196809000-00019

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Surg ISSN： 0003-4932 Impact factor: 12.969

× No keyword cloud information.

12 in total

1. CHOLELITHIASIS AND CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS: FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE RELATIVE INCIDENCE.

Authors: R M APPLEMAN; J T PRIESTLEY; R P GAGE
Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 1964-07 Impact factor: 7.616

2. EXPLORATION OF THE COMMON BILE DUCT.

Authors: B P COLCOCK; B PEREY
Journal: Surg Gynecol Obstet Date: 1964-01

3. Technique and evaluation of operative cholangiography.

Authors: J P ISAACS; M L DAVES
Journal: Surg Gynecol Obstet Date: 1960-07

4. Problems of retained and recurrent common bile duct stones.

Authors: S W SMITH; C ENGEL; B AVERBOOK; W P LONGMIRE
Journal: J Am Med Assoc Date: 1957-05-18

5. Intravenous cholangiography; results in one hundred cholecystectomized patients with upper abdominal symptoms.

Authors: D J SANDWEISS; H FULTON
Journal: J Am Med Assoc Date: 1955-11-05

6. Evaluation of routine operative cholangiography.

Authors: D O FERRIS; H M WEBER
Journal: AMA Arch Surg Date: 1956-08

7. The problem of the overlooked common duct stone.

Authors: J R PAINE; C N FIRME
Journal: Am Surg Date: 1954-11 Impact factor: 0.688

8. Residual stones in the common bile duct: the question of operative cholangiograms.

Authors: E V JOHNSTON; J M WAUGH; C A GOOD
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1954-03 Impact factor: 12.969

9. Operative cholangiography: an evaluation of 406 cases.

Authors: C G MIXTER; L HERMANSON; A L SEGEL
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1951-09 Impact factor: 12.969

10. Morbidity of surgical treatment for nonmalignant biliary tract disease.

Authors: F Glenn; C K McSherry; P Dineen
Journal: Surg Gynecol Obstet Date: 1968-01

21 in total

1. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: results of the technique in 210 patients.

Authors: A D Scott; A C Greville; L McMillan; J M Wellwood
Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 1.891

2. A comparison of intraoperative ultrasound versus cholangiography in the evaluation of the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors: J A Barteau; D Castro; M E Arregui; C Tetik
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 4.584

3. Selective use of operative cholangiography.

Authors: J L Grogono; W G Woods
Journal: World J Surg Date: 1986-12 Impact factor: 3.352

4. Clinical reliability of perioperative fluorocholangiography.

Authors: R Reiss; A A Deutsch; I Nudleman; M Cohen
Journal: World J Surg Date: 1986-04 Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5. Newer diagnostic procedures in pancreatobiliary surgery.

Authors: F Nakayama
Journal: Jpn J Surg Date: 1972-06

6. The prevention of residual biliary calculi.

Authors: J M Shore
Journal: Calif Med Date: 1971-05

7. Operative biliary endoscopy: experience with the flexible choledochoscope in 100 consecutive choledocholithotomies.

Authors: J M Shore; E Shore
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1970-02 Impact factor: 12.969

8. Comparison of operative ultrasonography and radiography in screening of the common bile duct for calculi.

Authors: J J Jakimowicz; H Rutten; P J Jürgens; E J Carol
Journal: World J Surg Date: 1987-10 Impact factor: 3.352

9. Comparison of intraoperative ultrasonography and cholangiography in detection of small common bile duct stones.

Authors: R Chardavoyne; S Kumari-Subhaya; L J Auguste; G Phillips; T A Stein; L Wise
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1987-07 Impact factor: 12.969

10. One per cent incidence of recurrent gallstones six to eight years after manometric cholangiography.

Authors: T T White; J Bordley
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1978-10 Impact factor: 12.969