Literature DB >> 7266112

Physician treatment of men and women patients: sex bias or appropriate care?

L M Verbrugge, R P Steiner.   

Abstract

This paper considers medical care given by physicians to men and women in the United States. It asks how often significant sex differences in care occur, and if these differences are attributable to medically relevant factors or not. Sex differences in diagnostic services, therapeutic services, and dispositions for follow-up are studied for All Visits, 15 major groups of complaints, and 5 specific complaints (fatigue, headache, vertigo/dizziness, chest pain, and back pain). Data are from the 1975 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). The analysis reveals that medical care is often similar for men and women, but a sizable numbers of significant sex differences occur (about 30 to 40 per cent of the services and dispositions studied), and they tend to show more medical care for women. Most of the differences persist even after controlling for medically relevant factors (patient age, seriousness of problem, diagnosis, prior visit status, and reasons for visit). Notably, women still receive more total prescriptions, and return appointments for many complaint groups. They receive more services for back pain and headaches and more follow-up plans for vertigo/dizziness and back pain. Remaining sex differences may be due to missing medical factors, patient requests for care, patient distress and needs for nurturance, and physician sex bias. In contrast to a recent San Diego study, national data show few significant sex differences in the extent and content of diagnostic services given for five common complaints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7266112     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198106000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  21 in total

Review 1.  Differences in clinical communication by gender.

Authors:  V Elderkin-Thompson; H Waitzkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice.

Authors:  F M Hajjaj; M S Salek; M K A Basra; A Y Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  The risk of multiple addictions. Guidelines for assessing a woman's alcohol and drug use.

Authors:  S Matteo
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

4.  How Do Gender Differences in Quality of Care Vary Across Medicare Advantage Plans?

Authors:  Chloe E Bird; Marc N Elliott; John L Adams; Eric C Schneider; David J Klein; Jacob W Dembosky; Sarah Gaillot; Allen M Fremont; Amelia M Haviland
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Treating female patients.

Authors:  G E Robinson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Predictors of Preoperative Program Non-Completion in Adolescents Referred for Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Cassie Brode; Megan Ratcliff; Jennifer Reiter-Purtill; Sanita Hunsaker; Michael Helmrath; Meg Zeller
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  The Validity of a New Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (SAGIS) for Evaluating Symptoms in the Clinical Setting.

Authors:  N A Koloski; M Jones; J Hammer; M von Wulffen; A Shah; H Hoelz; M Kutyla; D Burger; N Martin; S R Gurusamy; N J Talley; G Holtmann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Gender and utilization of ancillary services.

Authors:  A K Jha; G J Kuperman; E Rittenberg; D W Bates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  [Sex- or symptom-specific behavior of male residents? An analysis of diagnosis and therapy of ambulatory female and male patients with abdominal pain].

Authors:  D Conen; M Kuster
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1988

10.  Differences in the treatment of male and female patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  C Florakas; R Wilson; E Toffelmire; M Godwin; R Morton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.