Literature DB >> 11200549

Dynamic topography of pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) in psychogenic visual loss patients.

A Nakamura1, A Tabuchi, E Matsuda, W Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

We investigated to measure the objective visual acuity using pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) to help the diagnosis with psychogenic visual loss (PVL) who ranged in age from 7 to 14 years old. Pattern stimuli consisted of black and white checkerboard patterns (39, 26, 15 and 9') with a visual angle of 8 degrees and a contrast level of 15%. The pattern reversal frequency was 0.7 Hz. This resulted in an average of 100 PVEP per session. Visual acuity of 0.1 was consistent with the 39' pattern, 0.2 with the 26' pattern, 0.5 with the 15' pattern, and 1.0 with the 9' pattern. As the results, five PVL patients could measure visual acuity with this method in the present study. The PVEP is useful in evaluating the visual acuity and helped to diagnose the PVL patients. In addition we used the dynamic topography to study the difference in the results of the PVEP. The dynamic topography obtained from the results of the PVEP was analyzed. The flow type of the P100 component diverged into three types (separated type, hollow type and localized type) in the PVL patients and the normal children. The localized type was observed in 59.1% of normal children and in 56.3% of PVL patients. While the separated type was shown in 6.8% of normal children and in 8.3% of PVL patients. There were not significant differences between the PVL patients and the normal children in each type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11200549     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026409304135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  21 in total

1.  Retinal visual acuity with pattern VEP normal subjects and reproducibility.

Authors:  F Simon; B Rassow
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Dynamic topography of visual evoked potentials: a clinical application with basic study].

Authors:  J Tsutsui; A Tabuchi; Y Seki; S Fukai; S Ichihashi; J Takeda; H Kimura; H Enomoto; M Fukushima; S Kawashima
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1985-01

3.  VEPs and contrast.

Authors:  I J Murray; J J Kulikowski
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemi-retina: latency differences.

Authors:  D Lehman; H P Meles; Z Mir
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-11

5.  Speedy evoked potential methods for assessing vision in normal and ambylopic eyes: pros and cons.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  [Visual acuity measured by pattern visual evoked potential].

Authors:  A Hashiba; A Tabuchi; E Matsuda; W Yamaguchi
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1997-08

7.  [The normal response process of the dynamic topography of pattern visual evoked potentials].

Authors:  Y Masaki
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1990-10

8.  Pattern reversal visually evoked potentials in infants.

Authors:  S Sokol; V Dobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-01

9.  Developmental changes in the human visual system as reflected by the latency of the pattern reversal VEP.

Authors:  A Moskowitz; S Sokol
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-07

10.  Visually evoked potential (VEP) acuity: testability in a clinical pediatric population.

Authors:  J V Odom; M Green
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1984-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Prediction of visual evoked potentials at any surface location from a set of three recording electrodes.

Authors:  Babac A E Mazinani; Till D Waberski; Andre van Ooyen; Peter Walter
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of the step VEP in suspected functional visual acuity loss.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael S Bradnam; Gordon N Dutton; Anna L Lai Chooi Yan; Tim E Lavy; I Livingstone; Alison M Mackay; Jane R Mackinnon
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.