Literature DB >> 7261708

Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. I. Cytogenetic observations on a tandem duplication.

P A Poorman, M J Moses, L B Russell, N L Cacheiro.   

Abstract

Electron microscopy of surface-spread spermatocytes from mice heterozygous for a tandem duplication shows the heteromorphic synaptonemal complex (SC) to comprise two lateral elements of unequal length, the longer of which is buckled out in a characteristic loop, representing the unsynapsed portion of the duplication. The loop is a regular feature of late zygotene-early pachytene nuclei; it is longest at these early stages, but, through equalization of the two axes as a consequence of synaptic adjustment, it is replaced by a normal appearing SC at late pachytene. Because equalization, as indicated by a decrease in the percent difference between axes, may begin shortly after completion of synapsis, estimates of duplication segment length are restricted to a sample selected for least adjustment. --Although the mean position of the loop is constant at various pachytene substages, individual positions vary widely from cell to cell, consistent with the behavior expected of a duplication, but not of a deletion or an inversion. The length of the segment that is duplicated is estimated to be 22% of the normal chromosome, the midpoint of the segment is mapped at 0.61 of the chromosome distal to the kinetochore, and the ends of the segment are mapped at 0.50 to 0.72. Measurements of G-banded mitotic chromosomes give comparable values: duplication length, 24%; midpoint, 0.60, and segment ends, 0.48 and 0.71. This agreement constitutes further validation of the SC/spreading method for detecting and analyzing chromosomal rearrangements at pachytene and substantiates the fidelity with which the axes and SCs represent the behavior of chromosomes in synapsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7261708     DOI: 10.1007/BF00285846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  9 in total

1.  Radiation-induced mutations at mouse hemoglobin loci.

Authors:  L B Russell; W L Russell; R A Popp; C Vaughan; K B Jacobson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mouse chromosome translocations: visualization and analysis by electron microscopy of the synaptonemal complex.

Authors:  M J Moses; L B Russel; N L Cacheiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus). III. Quantitative evaluation.

Authors:  M J Moses; G H Slatton; T M Gambling; C F Starmer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-04-20       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  The synaptonemal complex as an indicator of chromosomal damage.

Authors:  M J Moses
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Differentiation of the synaptonemal complex and the kinetochore in Locusta spermatocytes studied by whole mount electron microscopy.

Authors:  S J Counce; G F Meyer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973-11-21       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  The behaviour of chromosomal axes in Searle's X-autosome translocation.

Authors:  A J Solari
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Effect of gene dosage on expression of mitochondrial malic enzyme activity in the mouse.

Authors:  E G Bernstine; L B Russell; C S Cain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-02-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Synaptosomal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. II. Synaptic adjustment in a tandem duplication.

Authors:  M J Moses; P A Poorman
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus). I. Morphology of the autosomal complement in spread preparations.

Authors:  M J Moses
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-03-16       Impact factor: 4.316

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Synapsis in single and double heterozygotes for partially overlapping inversions in chromosome 1 of the house mouse.

Authors:  P M Borodin; I P Gorlov
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Monte Moses and Adelaide Carpenter: Duke, 1974-1976.

Authors:  Adelaide T C Carpenter
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Meiosis in carriers of heteromorphic bivalents: sex differences and implications for male fertility.

Authors:  A H Peters; A W Plug; P de Boer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  G-band position effects on meiotic synapsis and crossing over.

Authors:  T Ashley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Application of advanced fluorescence microscopy to the structure of meiotic chromosomes.

Authors:  Peter M Carlton
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-04-13

6.  Male pachytene pairing in single and double translocation heterozygotes and spermatogenic impairment in the mouse.

Authors:  P de Boer; A G Searle; F A van der Hoeven; D G de Rooij; C V Beechey
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Synaptonemal complex damage as a measure of genotoxicity at meiosis.

Authors:  J W Allen; P A Poorman; L C Backer; J B Gibson; B Westbrook-Collins; M J Moses
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.691

8.  Synaptonemal complex analysis of X-7 translocations in male mice. I. R3 and R5 quadrivalents.

Authors:  T Ashley; L B Russell; N L Cacheiro
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. III. Cytogenetic observations on two paracentric inversions.

Authors:  P A Poorman; M J Moses; M T Davisson; T H Roderick
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Synaptosomal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. II. Synaptic adjustment in a tandem duplication.

Authors:  M J Moses; P A Poorman
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.