Literature DB >> 7258342

Sexual dimorphism and allometry in primate ossa coxae.

K Steudel.   

Abstract

Five measurements were taken on the ossa coxae of 454 adult primates representing Ceboidea, Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea. Sex differences in these variables and their relationships to overall body size and sexual dimorphism were tested by means of Student's T-test and regression analysis. The study attempts to clarify the nature of primate pelvic sexual dimorphism, including allometric effects, and more specifically, test the assertion made by Mobb and Wood (1977) that sexual dimorphism in body size in not an important determinant in pelvic sex differences. Variables that contribute to the size of the birth canal tend to be larger in females than males in all taxa studied except two. In these, Hylobates and Alouatta, there were no significant differences between the sexes for any of the five variables. In general, sexual dimorphism in variables contributing to the size of the birth canal was correlated (r approximately or equal to 0.8) with sexual dimorphism in body size. Furthermore, the coefficients of allometry underlying pelvic sex differences were shown to be moderately correlated (r approximately or equal to 0.5) with sexual dimorphism in size. The influence of other adaptive factors on primate pelvic sexual dimorphism are also briefly discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7258342     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330550208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  2 in total

1.  Sex differences in the pelvis did not evolve de novo in modern humans.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Nicole D S Grunstra; Eva Zaffarini; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Big-bodied males help us recognize that females have big pelves.

Authors:  Robert G Tague
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.868

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.