Literature DB >> 33767411

Sex differences in the pelvis did not evolve de novo in modern humans.

Barbara Fischer1, Nicole D S Grunstra2,3,4, Eva Zaffarini5, Philipp Mitteroecker2,3.   

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that the strong sexual dimorphism of the human pelvis evolved for delivering the relatively large human foetuses. Here we compare pelvic sex differences across modern humans and chimpanzees using a comprehensive geometric morphometric approach. Even though the magnitude of sex differences in pelvis shape was two times larger in humans than in chimpanzees, we found that the pattern is almost identical in the two species. We conclude that this pattern of pelvic sex differences did not evolve de novo in modern humans and must have been present in the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees, and thus also in the extinct Homo species. We further suggest that this shared pattern was already present in early mammals and propose a hypothesis of facilitated variation as an explanation: the conserved mammalian endocrine system strongly constrains the evolution of the pattern of pelvic differences but enables rapid evolutionary change of the magnitude of sexual dimorphism, which in turn facilitated the rapid increase in hominin brain size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767411     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01425-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  38 in total

1.  Expanding the evolutionary explanations for sex differences in the human skeleton.

Authors:  Holly M Dunsworth
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2020-05-02

2.  The reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans.

Authors:  Marija Durić; Zoran Rakocević; Danijela Donić
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Sex differences in the pubic bone.

Authors:  S L WASHBURN
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1948-06       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Sex differences in the pelves of primates.

Authors:  A H SCHULTZ
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1949-09       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the os coxae and the effects of microevolutionary processes.

Authors:  Lia Betti
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Covariation between human pelvis shape, stature, and head size alleviates the obstetric dilemma.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sex differences in the sciatic notch of great apes and modern humans.

Authors:  L D Hager
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Accuracy of sex determination using morphological traits of the human pelvis.

Authors:  T Rogers; S Saunders
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.832

9.  Sexual dimorphism in the human bony pelvis, with a consideration of the Neandertal pelvis from Kebara Cave, Israel.

Authors:  R G Tague
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Developmental evidence for obstetric adaptation of the human female pelvis.

Authors:  Alik Huseynov; Christoph P E Zollikofer; Walter Coudyzer; Dominic Gascho; Christian Kellenberger; Ricarda Hinzpeter; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.