Literature DB >> 15624207

Big-bodied males help us recognize that females have big pelves.

Robert G Tague1.   

Abstract

Schultz ([1949] Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 7:401-424) presented a conundrum: among primates, sexual dimorphism of the pelvis is a developmental adjunct to dimorphism in other aspects of the body, albeit in the converse direction. Among species in which males are larger than females in body size, females are larger than males in some pelvic dimensions; species with little sexual dimorphism in nonpelvic size show little pelvic dimorphism. Obstetrical difficulty does not explain this relationship. The present study addresses this issue, evaluating the relationship between pelvic and femoral sexual dimorphism in 12 anthropoid species. The hypothesis is that species in which males are significantly larger than females in femoral size will have a higher incidence, magnitude, and variability of pelvic sexual dimorphism, with females having relatively larger pelves than males, compared with species monomorphic in femoral size. The results are consistent with the hypothesis. The proposed explanation is that the default pelvic anatomy in adulthood is that of the female; testosterone redirects growth from the default type to that of the male by differentially enhancing and repressing growth among the pelvic dimensions. Testosterone also influences sexual dimorphism of the femur. The magnitude of the pelvic response to testosterone is greater in species that are sexually dimorphic in the femur than in those that are monomorphic. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15624207      PMCID: PMC7159750          DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  32 in total

1.  Long bone articular and diaphyseal structure in Old World monkeys and apes. II: Estimation of body mass.

Authors:  Christopher B Ruff
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  The influence of the testes on the shaping of the bony pelvis in mice.

Authors:  E S CRELIN; D K BLOOD
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1961-08

3.  Age changes in the pubic symphysis of Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  R G Rawlins
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Sex differences in the pelves of primates.

Authors:  A H SCHULTZ
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1949-09       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 5.  Estrogen, bone, growth and sex: a sea change in conventional wisdom.

Authors:  M M Grumbach
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.634

6.  Sexual dimorphism and allometry in primate ossa coxae.

Authors:  K Steudel
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Allometry and sexual dimorphism in the primate innominate bone.

Authors:  G E Mobb; B A Wood
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1977-12

8.  Sexual dimorphism in the pelvic midplane and its relationship to Neandertal reproductive patterns.

Authors:  D E Walrath; M M Glantz
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Sexual dimorphism in the human bony pelvis, with a consideration of the Neandertal pelvis from Kebara Cave, Israel.

Authors:  R G Tague
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  The squirrel monkey: receptor-mediated end-organ resistance to progesterone?

Authors:  G P Chrousos; D Renquist; D Brandon; D Barnard; D Fowler; D L Loriaux; M B Lipsett
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  8 in total

1.  Ontogeny of the female femur: geometric morphometric analysis applied on current living individuals of a Spanish population.

Authors:  Aniol Pujol; Carme Rissech; Jacint Ventura; Joaquim Badosa; Daniel Turbón
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Sex prediction from the femur and hip bone using a sample of CT images from a Spanish population.

Authors:  Ana Clavero; Miquel Salicrú; Daniel Turbón
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  What ape proximal femora tell us about femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison.

Authors:  Joost T Fikkers; Heinse W Bouma; Stefan F de Boer; Paul A Toogood; Paulien M van Kampen; Tom Hogervorst
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Sex differences in the pelvis did not evolve de novo in modern humans.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Nicole D S Grunstra; Eva Zaffarini; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Developmental evidence for obstetric adaptation of the human female pelvis.

Authors:  Alik Huseynov; Christoph P E Zollikofer; Walter Coudyzer; Dominic Gascho; Christian Kellenberger; Ricarda Hinzpeter; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pelvic sexual dimorphism among species monomorphic in body size: relationship to relative newborn body mass.

Authors:  Robert G Tague
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Biomechanical trade-offs in the pelvic floor constrain the evolution of the human birth canal.

Authors:  Ekaterina Stansfield; Krishna Kumar; Philipp Mitteroecker; Nicole D S Grunstra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The evolution of pelvic canal shape and rotational birth in humans.

Authors:  Ekaterina Stansfield; Barbara Fischer; Nicole D S Grunstra; Maria Villa Pouca; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 7.431

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.