Literature DB >> 7242334

Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: evidence against an expectancy hypothesis.

K J Holyoak, W A Mah.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7242334     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.

Authors:  A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-11

2.  Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: an expectancy hypothesis.

Authors:  M Marschark; A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-05

3.  Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons.

Authors:  W P Banks; J Flora
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.

Authors:  P B Buckley; C B Gillman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-12

5.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

6.  Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  The role of part-whole information in reasoning about relative size.

Authors:  K M Sailor; E J Shoben
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

2.  Semantic congruity effects in perceptual comparisons.

Authors:  W M Petrusic; J V Baranski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

3.  The role of expectancy in comparative judgments.

Authors:  E J Shoben; K M Sailor; M Y Wang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-01

4.  Evidence for implicit scaling in comparative judgment.

Authors:  K M Sailor; K M Pineda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-07

5.  Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: salience, expectancy, and associative priming.

Authors:  M Marschark
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-03

6.  Semantic congruity and expectancy as separate processes.

Authors:  W P Banks; H White
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-11

7.  Brain reading and behavioral methods provide complementary perspectives on the representation of concepts.

Authors:  Andrew James Bauer; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.