Literature DB >> 7239127

Effect of bilateral vagosympathetic nerve blockade on response of the dog upper esophageal sphincter (UES) to intraesophageal distention and acid.

J M Freiman, T Y El-Sharkawy, N E Diamant.   

Abstract

The present study in dogs was performed to elucidate (a) the upper esophageal sphincter responses to intraesophageal distention and acid perfusion and (b) the effect of bilateral nerve blockade on these responses. Balloon distention (5-40 cm3) at 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm below the sphincter produced up to a 400% increase in sphincter pressure. The threshold for this response increased, and the maximum sphincter response decreased as distention was performed more distally in the esophagus. Perfusion of acid (0.1-0.4 N HCl) at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter and at 5, 10, and 15 cm below, produced a similar increase in sphincter pressure. The maximum response to acid occurred on perfusion at the sphincter and the response decreased progressively with perfusion distally. Bilateral nerve blockade produced (a) no change in resting sphincter pressure or in the sphincter response to swallowing, (b) a partial reduction in the maximum sphincter response to distention, and (c) abolition of the response to acid. A significant portion of the afferent pathway for the response of the upper esophageal sphincter to distention and virtually all the afferent pathways for the response to acid are carried in the vagosympathetic trunks presumably via the recurrent laryngeal nerves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7239127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  22 in total

1.  Effect of chronic and acute cigarette smoking on the pharyngoglottal closure reflex.

Authors:  K Dua; E Bardan; J Ren; Z Sui; R Shaker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  The role of the superior laryngeal nerve in esophageal reflexes.

Authors:  I M Lang; B K Medda; S Jadcherla; R Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  Brain stem control of the phases of swallowing.

Authors:  Ivan M Lang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  The Relationship Between Hiatal Hernia and Cricopharyngeus Muscle Dysfunction.

Authors:  Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer; Anaïs Rameau; Maggie A Kuhn; Matthew Kaufman; Peter C Belafsky
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Functional relationships between cricopharyngeal sphincter and oesophageal body in response to graded intraluminal distension.

Authors:  N A Andreollo; D G Thompson; G P Kendall; R J Earlam
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Older Age Reduces Upper Esophageal Sphincter and Esophageal Body Responses to Simulated Slow and Ultraslow Reflux Events and Post-Reflux Residue.

Authors:  Ling Mei; Arshish Dua; Mark Kern; Siyuan Gao; Francis Edeani; Kulwinder Dua; Amy Wilson; Shaina Lynch; Patrick Sanvanson; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Upper esophageal sphincter tone and reactivity to stress in patients with a history of globus sensation.

Authors:  I J Cook; J Dent; S M Collins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Effect of aging on hypopharyngeal safe volume and the aerodigestive reflexes protecting the airways.

Authors:  Kulwinder S Dua; Sri Naveen Surapaneni; Shiko Kuribayashi; Mohammed Hafeezullah; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Assessment of the neural defect in a dog with idiopathic megaesophagus.

Authors:  B J Tan; N E Diamant
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Globus sensation and increased upper esophageal sphincter pressure with distal esophageal acid perfusion.

Authors:  Ryoji Tokashiki; Nobutoshi Funato; Mamoru Suzuki
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.