BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is not clear how age affects airway protective mechanisms. We investigated the effects of aging on upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and esophageal body pressure responses to slow and ultraslow simulated reflux events and post-reflux residue. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 11 elderly (74 ± 9 years old) and 11 young (28 ± 7 years old) healthy volunteers. Participants were placed in a supine position and evaluated by concurrent high-resolution impedance manometry and an esophageal infusion technique. Potential conditions of gastroesophageal reflux were simulated, via infusion of 0.1 N HCl and saline. UES and esophageal pressure responses were measured during the following: slow infusion (1 mL/s) for 60 seconds, 60 seconds of postinfusion dwell period, ultraslow infusion (0.05 mL/s) for 60 seconds, and 60 seconds of a postinfusion dwell period. All infusions were repeated 3 times. We used the UES high-pressure zone contractile integral (UES-CI) to determine responses of the UES. RESULTS: Young and elderly subjects each had a significant increase in the UES-CI during slow infusions and during entire passive dwell intervals compared with baseline (P < .01, both groups). Ultraslow infusions were associated with a significant increase in UES-CI in only the young group, in the late infusion period, and into the dwell interval (P < .01). During the slow infusions and their associated dwell periods, young subjects had a higher frequency of secondary peristalsis than elderly subjects (P < .05). There was more secondary peristalsis during active infusions than dwell intervals. Secondary peristalsis was scarce during ultraslow infusions in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: UES and esophageal body pressure responses to low-volume ultraslow reflux and associated post-reflux residue are reduced in elderly individuals. This deterioration could have negative effects on airway protection for people in this age group.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is not clear how age affects airway protective mechanisms. We investigated the effects of aging on upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and esophageal body pressure responses to slow and ultraslow simulated reflux events and post-reflux residue. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 11 elderly (74 ± 9 years old) and 11 young (28 ± 7 years old) healthy volunteers. Participants were placed in a supine position and evaluated by concurrent high-resolution impedance manometry and an esophageal infusion technique. Potential conditions of gastroesophageal reflux were simulated, via infusion of 0.1 N HCl and saline. UES and esophageal pressure responses were measured during the following: slow infusion (1 mL/s) for 60 seconds, 60 seconds of postinfusion dwell period, ultraslow infusion (0.05 mL/s) for 60 seconds, and 60 seconds of a postinfusion dwell period. All infusions were repeated 3 times. We used the UES high-pressure zone contractile integral (UES-CI) to determine responses of the UES. RESULTS: Young and elderly subjects each had a significant increase in the UES-CI during slow infusions and during entire passive dwell intervals compared with baseline (P < .01, both groups). Ultraslow infusions were associated with a significant increase in UES-CI in only the young group, in the late infusion period, and into the dwell interval (P < .01). During the slow infusions and their associated dwell periods, young subjects had a higher frequency of secondary peristalsis than elderly subjects (P < .05). There was more secondary peristalsis during active infusions than dwell intervals. Secondary peristalsis was scarce during ultraslow infusions in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: UES and esophageal body pressure responses to low-volume ultraslow reflux and associated post-reflux residue are reduced in elderly individuals. This deterioration could have negative effects on airway protection for people in this age group.
Authors: M M Szczesniak; R B H Williams; H M Brake; J C Maclean; I E Cole; I J Cook Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Michal M Szczesniak; Sergio E Fuentealba; Anthea Burnett; Ian J Cook Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: C Prakash Gyawali; Daniel Sifrim; Dustin A Carlson; Mary Hawn; David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Roberto Penagini; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Roger Tatum; Michel Vaezi; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 3.960