Literature DB >> 3345926

Functional relationships between cricopharyngeal sphincter and oesophageal body in response to graded intraluminal distension.

N A Andreollo1, D G Thompson, G P Kendall, R J Earlam.   

Abstract

Responses of the cricopharyngeal sphincter to graded intraluminal distension were studied in order to determine its response threshold and to define the functional relationship between the sphincter and oesophageal body. Nine normal subjects underwent manometric study using a multilumen tube with an attached inflatable balloon sited 10 cm below the sphincter. Sphincteric and oesophageal motor responses to six graded balloon inflations were recorded in each subject. The sphincter responded to distension with increasing rise in pressure, from a median value of 42.5 mmHg at lowest levels of distension to 95 mmHg at maximal tolerated distension. Non-swallow related contractile activity was stimulated in the oesophageal body proximal to the distension and increased in quantity as inflation progressed. Distal propagation of this secondary activity was progressively inhibited with increasing distension. These interrelated changes thus show the normal upper oesophageal clearance responses to intraluminal distension. It is suggested that their more widespread application, in addition to standard manometric techniques, might provide a more rational evaluation of those patients suspected to have impaired oesophageal clearance, but in whom standard manometry is non-diagnostic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3345926      PMCID: PMC1433303          DOI: 10.1136/gut.29.2.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  10 in total

1.  Motor responses of the esophagus to distention.

Authors:  B CREAMER; J SCHLEGEL
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Human upper esophageal sphincter. Response to volume, osmotic, and acid stimuli.

Authors:  D C Gerhardt; T J Shuck; R A Bordeaux; D H Winship
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Patterns and origin of some esophageal responses to stretch and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J Christensen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Esophageal responses to distension and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J Christensen; G F Lund
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Clinical conference in pulmonary disease. Aspiration and occult esophageal disorders.

Authors:  R L Hughes; R A Freilich; D E Bytell; R M Craig; J M Moran
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Upper esophageal sphincter: does it care about reflux?

Authors:  D H Winship
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Esophageal dysfunction in esophagopharyngeal regurgitation.

Authors:  D C Gerhardt; D O Castell; D H Winship; T J Shuck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Motor responses of the oesophagus to intraluminal distension in normal subjects and patients with oesophageal clearance disorders.

Authors:  G P Kendall; D G Thompson; S J Day; N Garvie
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Effect of bilateral vagosympathetic nerve blockade on response of the dog upper esophageal sphincter (UES) to intraesophageal distention and acid.

Authors:  J M Freiman; T Y El-Sharkawy; N E Diamant
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Upper esophageal responses to intraluminal distention in man.

Authors:  D R Enzmann; G S Harell; F F Zboralske
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 22.682

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Pathological pharyngo-esophageal interactions.

Authors:  B T Massey
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Simultaneous videoradiography and pharyngeal solid state manometry (videomanometry) in 25 nondysphagic volunteers.

Authors:  R Olsson; H Nilsson; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Site and mechanism of pain perception with oesophageal balloon distension and intravenous edrophonium in patients with oesophageal chest pain.

Authors:  J S de Caestecker; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Giant fibrovascular polyp of the oesophagus: report of a case and effects on oesophageal function.

Authors:  R Penagini; T Ranzi; P Velio; P Zannini; G Negri; G Pezzuoli; P A Bianchi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Lowered oesophageal sensory thresholds in patients with symptomatic but not excess gastro-oesophageal reflux: evidence for a spectrum of visceral sensitivity in GORD.

Authors:  K C Trimble; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Repetitive contractions of the upper esophageal body and sphincter in achalasia.

Authors:  Z G Zhang; N E Diamant
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  On the origin of rhythmic contractile activity of the esophagus in early achalasia, a clinical case study.

Authors:  Ji-Hong Chen; Xuan-Yu Wang; Louis W C Liu; Wenzhen Yu; Yuanjie Yu; Liang Zhao; Jan D Huizinga
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.