| Literature DB >> 7231247 |
J M Bruner, L J Krenis, J M Kunsman, A P Sherman.
Abstract
Blood pressure measurements can be obtained in the clinical setting by a variety of methods, direct and indirect, but with varying results. Disparities between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements are due in part to physiological considerations, but are largely conditioned by the frequency response of the recording system. In this, the second of three part, the authors conclude that there is no easy solution to the problems confronting direct measurement of blood pressure, and that the interim course seems to be insistence upon definition of the characteristics of measurement systems employed in producing investigative data. Part I (Med. Instrum. January-February 1981) concluded that comparative studies of direct and indirect blood pressure fall into two groups--those resulting in close agreement between methods, and those that do not. In part III (May-June 1981), the authors will examine their own study of a group of patients undergoing surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1981 PMID: 7231247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Instrum ISSN: 0090-6689