Literature DB >> 7225952

A comparison of visual, brainstem auditory, and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis.

S J Purves, M D Low, J Galloway, B Reeves.   

Abstract

Multimodality evoked potentials testing including PVEPs, SEPs and BAEPs was done in 112 patients who were known or suspected to have multiple sclerosis. The incidence of abnormal evoked potential findings in each of these systems was considered in patients in the different diagnostic categories of M.S. Results were also evaluated with respect to the presence of abnormal clinical visual, somatosensory, or brainstem signs. The PVEP was found to be the most frequently abnormal in even patients without clinical involvement in the visual system (45% of patients with definite, probable, or possible M.S.), the SEP was less frequently abnormal in the absence of clinical signs (35% in patients with M.S.), and the BAEP showed the lowest frequency of abnormalities in patients without brainstem signs (14% in patients with M.S.). Combining the three types of evoked potentials significantly increased the percentage of M.S. patients having abnormal findings, compared to any of these tests alone, with 97% of "definite" M.S. patients, 86% of "probable" M.S. patients and 63% of "possible" M.S. patients having at least one of these EP tests abnormal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7225952     DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100042773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0317-1671            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Clinical neurophysiology in the assessment of neurological symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  A B Mongey; D Glynn; M Hutchinson; B Bresnihan
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Multiple sclerosis: diagnostic value of computerized tomography with delayed scanning after a double-dose of contrast medium in comparison with other diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C Weitze; G Hertel; W Brittner
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a follow up study.

Authors:  W B Matthews; J R Wattam-Bell; E Pountney
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Evoked potential changes in clinically definite multiple sclerosis: a two year follow up study.

Authors:  J C Walsh; R Garrick; J Cameron; J G McLeod
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Stapedius reflex in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H Mattle; T Spillmann; N Dillier; K Hess
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.849

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.