Literature DB >> 7119812

Evoked potential changes in clinically definite multiple sclerosis: a two year follow up study.

J C Walsh, R Garrick, J Cameron, J G McLeod.   

Abstract

Visual, spinal and somatosensory evoked potentials were performed on 56 patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis at the beginning and end of a 2 1/2 year follow-up period. At the initial examination one or both visual evoked potentials were abnormal in all but nine patients (84%), five of whom had abnormalities of either spinal or somatosensory evoked responses; that is, one or more abnormal results were obtained from 52 of 56 (91%) patients. At the final examination there were abnormalities of one or more evoked potentials in 55 of the 56 (98%) patients. There was an increase in latency of the components of the evoked responses over the period; reduction in latency in individual patients was exceptional. The change in these electrophysiological measurements correlated with the increase in clinical disability of the group of patients over the period of study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7119812      PMCID: PMC491425          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.45.6.494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  24 in total

1.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P Asselman; D W Chadwick; D C Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Auditory brain stem responses in neurological disease.

Authors:  A Starr; J Achor
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1975-11

3.  Visual and spinal evoked potentials in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F L Mastaglia; J L Black; D W Collins
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-25

4.  Abnormalities of the auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Robinson; P Rudge
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  [Recording of visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  F Chain; J Mallecourt; M Leblanc; F Lhermitte
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

7.  Somatosensory evoked responses in multiple sclerosis patients with varying sensory loss.

Authors:  N S Namerow
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  Diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  The cervical somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D G Small; W B Matthews; M Small
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Pattern reversal evoked visual potential in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W B Matthews; D G Small; M Small; E Pountney
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  9 in total

1.  Short-term neurophysiological monitoring in multiple sclerosis bouts. Evaluation of steroid treatment.

Authors:  V Scaioli; C Milanese; A Salmaggi; L LaMantia; A Campi; M Eoli; F Panzica
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-03

2.  Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  L Leocani; M Rovaris; F M Boneschi; S Medaglini; P Rossi; V Martinelli; S Amadio; G Comi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Multiple sclerosis: diagnostic value of computerized tomography with delayed scanning after a double-dose of contrast medium in comparison with other diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C Weitze; G Hertel; W Brittner
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Hyperbaric oxygen in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: visual evoked potentials and clinical effects.

Authors:  J Neiman; B Y Nilsson; P O Barr; D J Perrins
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Evoked potential changes in clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A W De Weerd
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Serial evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis bouts. Relation to steroid treatment.

Authors:  L La Mantia; F Riti; C Milanese; A Salmaggi; M Eoli; C Ciano; G Avanzini
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1994-10

7.  Visual evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Effect of time interval, age and disease dissemination.

Authors:  S J Jones
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: relative sensitivities and specificities for reclassification according to the Poser committee criteria.

Authors:  S Beer; K M Rösler; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Neuromagnetic responses to tactile stimulation of the fingers: Evidence for reduced cortical inhibition for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and children with epilepsy.

Authors:  William Gaetz; Michael T Jurkiewicz; Sudha Kilaru Kessler; Lisa Blaskey; Erin S Schwartz; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.881

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.