Literature DB >> 7077339

Evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a follow up study.

W B Matthews, J R Wattam-Bell, E Pountney.   

Abstract

Visual, somatosensory and brain stem auditory evoked potentials were recorded in 84 patients in whom the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis was under consideration. The patients were followed up for a maximum of 38 months or until a definite diagnosis of multiple sclerosis or of some other condition was established. Seven patients were found not to have multiple sclerosis. Abnormal evoked potentials indicating clinically silent lesions were found at the initial investigation in fourteen of the twenty-eight patients in whom a diagnosis of clinically definite multiple sclerosis was accepted during the period of follow up. In the thirty-seven patients in whom no change in clinical category occurred during the period such abnormalities were found in five. The visual evoked potential was found to be of greatest predictive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7077339      PMCID: PMC491364          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.45.4.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  17 in total

1.  Visual and spinal evoked potentials in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F L Mastaglia; J L Black; D W Collins
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-25

2.  Abnormalities of the auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Robinson; P Rudge
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Visual and somatosensory evoked cortical potentials in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W Trojaborg; E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

5.  Multiple sclerosis plaque related to abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  W B Matthews; M Esiri
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 6.  Diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.291

7.  Differences in brainstem response latency with age and sex.

Authors:  H A Beagley; J B Sheldrake
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1978-08

8.  The cervical somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D G Small; W B Matthews; M Small
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Crossed acoustic response combined with visual and somatosensory evoked responses in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  R E Clifford-Jones; G P Clarke; P Mayles
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Pattern reversal evoked visual potential in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W B Matthews; D G Small; M Small; E Pountney
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  13 in total

1.  The effect of contrast reduction on pattern-reversal VEPs in suspected multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis.

Authors:  Adrian W Davidson; Richard F Scott; Keith W Mitchell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Short-term neurophysiological monitoring in multiple sclerosis bouts. Evaluation of steroid treatment.

Authors:  V Scaioli; C Milanese; A Salmaggi; L LaMantia; A Campi; M Eoli; F Panzica
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-03

3.  Orienting reaction in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  R Rogozea; V Florea-Ciocoiu
Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci       Date:  1986 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  Aetiological role of viruses in multiple sclerosis: a review.

Authors:  A J Larner
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Somatosensory evoked potentials in acute neurological decompression illness.

Authors:  A Murrison; E Glasspool; J Francis; M Sedgwick
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Niphon Chirapapaisan; Sawarin Laotaweerungsawat; Wanicha Chuenkongkaew; Patthanee Samsen; Ngamkae Ruangvaravate; Atiporn Thuangtong; Nacha Chanvarapha
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Serial evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis bouts. Relation to steroid treatment.

Authors:  L La Mantia; F Riti; C Milanese; A Salmaggi; M Eoli; C Ciano; G Avanzini
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1994-10

8.  Clinical application of motion-onset visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Z Kubová; M Kuba
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Disseminated lesions at presentation in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  I E Ormerod; W I McDonald; G H du Boulay; B E Kendall; I F Moseley; A M Halliday; R Kakigi; A Kriss; E Peringer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Multiple sclerosis: failure of treatment with verapamil in a pilot trial.

Authors:  S Komoly; G Jakab; A Fazekas
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.