Literature DB >> 7204442

Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Analysis of fourteen failures in forty-one hips.

W C Head.   

Abstract

Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip was performed on forty-one hips in forty patients from 1977 to 1979. Results were analyzed with particular attention to prosthetic failures, which occurred in fourteen hips. Loosening of the femoral component occurred in five hips; loosening of both the femoral and the acetabular component, in two hips; loosening of the acetabular component, in two hips; loosening of the acetabular component, in two hips; avascular necrosis of the femoral head (with no concomitant femoral-component loosening), in two hips; and femoral neck fracture, in three hips. Time to failure averaged eighteen months (range, three months to two and one-half years). The over-all failure rate of 34 per cent is considered unacceptably high and therefore I do not recommend the Wagner arthroplasty for routine use. Factors tht may be responsible for the increased failure rate include a high susceptibility to avascular necrosis of the femoral head, the younger age of patients in whom this operation is performed, and the biomechanical design properties of the prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7204442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  [Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods and first results].

Authors:  T Hess; T Gampe; C Köttgen; B Szawlowski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Hip implant evaluation in an arthritic animal model.

Authors:  T W Phillips; K R Gurr; D R Rao
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Authors:  Eric J Yue; Miguel E Cabanela; Gavan P Duffy; Michael G Heckman; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Blood flow to the femoral head and hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  P E Beaulé; R Ganz; M Leunig
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Mechanical failure in double cup arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  D Hernandez-Vaquero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Total hip replacement with Müller prosthesis and ICLH double cup. 2- to 6-year results of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  A Reigstad; M Brandt; K R Hetland
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1986

7.  Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Christine M Pui; Matthew J Ludeman; Thomas P Vail; Marc D Silverstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty of the canine hip.

Authors:  J Schatzker; S B Goodman; G Sumner-Smith; V L Fornasier; N Goften; R S Bell
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1987

9.  An initial experience with hip resurfacing versus cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Justin Michael Arndt; Glenn D Wera; Victor M Goldberg
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-06-25

10.  Serum and urine metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anastasia K Skipor; Patricia A Campbell; Leslie M Patterson; Harlan C Anstutz; Thomas P Schmalzried; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.