Literature DB >> 7196975

The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care.

P M Gertman, J D Restuccia.   

Abstract

A major national health policy objective is to improve the efficiency of hospital utilization. To evaluate programmatic interventions with this objective, such as the Professional Standards Review Organization program, measures of appropriate use are a fundamental need. This report represents the results of two developmental trials of a new technique, labeled the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP), for assessing potentially unnecessary hospital days of care. Twenty-seven objective criteria items related to medical services, nursing/life support services and patient condition factors were incorporated in the protocol. If any one of the criteria was met, the day was deemed "appropriate," and if none was met, the day was deemed "inappropriate" at an acute hospital level of care. A reviewer could override the objective criteria in either direction in reaching a final judgment. Three reviewers, two nurses and one physician each reviewed 200 charts at a teaching hospital. After correcting for a small number of abstracting errors, overall agreement rates between pairs of reviewers ranged from 92 to 94 per cent, levels significant p less than 0.0001. Of all cases judged inappropriate by at least one of the reviewers, specific agreement rates for the reviewer pairs on which days were inappropriate ranged from 73 to 79 per cent. These overall agreement rates and specific agreement rates on days of care judged as inappropriate are higher than those of any previously reported assessment methods. A parallel study of the appropriateness of admissions in these same cases, using purely subjective reviewer judgments, found overall agreement rates averaging 90 per cent, but rates of specific agreement on inappropriate admissions were less than 40 per cent between pairs of reviewers. Along with comparisons to other, more subjective, assessment techniques, this finding suggests that objective criteria are a vital element in developing methodologically sound techniques for assessing appropriate hospital use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7196975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  71 in total

1.  Private finance initiative. Partnership between private and NHS is not necessarily wrong.

Authors:  F McGinty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-22

2.  How valid are utilization review tools in assessing appropriate use of acute care beds?

Authors:  N Kalant; M Berlinguet; J G Diodati; L Dragatakis; F Marcotte
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Factors affecting appropriateness of hospital utilization in two hospitals in Turkey.

Authors:  S Kaya; K Eroğlu; G Vural; M Shwartz; J D Restuccia
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Inappropriately delayed discharge from hospital: what do we know?

Authors:  Norman Vetter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-26

5.  Review of the utilisation of a university hospital in Barcelona (Spain): evolution 1992-1996.

Authors:  G Navarro; A Prat-Marin; M Asenjo; A Menacho; A Trilla; L Salleras
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Integration of a stand-alone expert system with a hospital information system.

Authors:  J W Hales; R M Gardner; S M Huff
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

7.  A confidential enquiry into emergency hospital admissions on the Isle of Wight, UK.

Authors:  M Denman-Johnson; P Bingham; S George
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The effects of utilization review on hospital use and expenditures: a covariance analysis.

Authors:  T M Wickizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Appropriateness of admission and length of stay in a Turkish Military Hospital.

Authors:  Kadir Teke; Adnan Kisa; Cesim Demir; Korkut Ersoy
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol is a poor predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  N A O'Regan; L Healy; M O Cathail; T W Law; G O'Carroll; J Clare; S Timmons; K A O'Connor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.