Literature DB >> 9328544

A confidential enquiry into emergency hospital admissions on the Isle of Wight, UK.

M Denman-Johnson1, P Bingham, S George.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the proportion of potentially avoidable emergency short term admissions to hospital and to identify ways in which they could have been avoided.
DESIGN: Confidential enquiry by peer review group.
SETTING: St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight.
SUBJECTS: All emergency, short term admissions (discharged home within five days) to medicine, general surgery, orthopaedics, gynaecology, ENT, and ophthalmology specialties for 28 (24 hour) days over a six month period in 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Appropriateness of admissions decided by the peer group, the peer group's opinion of ideal management, and the patients' views on the appropriateness of their admission.
RESULTS: Altogether 139 cases satisfied the inclusion criteria. Complete data were collected on 123 cases and the peer group considered 81 in the time available. Twenty one of the 81 cases were judged "potentially avoidable". These represent 9.5% (95% CI 6.3%, 13.5%) of short term admissions to the specialties studied. The peer group considered that seven of 10 patients referred by a general practitioner (GP) could have been managed by the GP alone and that the remaining three had been referred appropriately but need not have been admitted had a consultant opinion been available in the accident and emergency (A&E) department. Two of the 10 would have required home support to avoid hospital admission. Five of 11 patients who referred themselves to A&E could have been discharged home without admission and without recourse to a specialist opinion. The remaining six could have been discharged had a consultant opinion been available in A&E.
CONCLUSIONS: Urgent consultant opinion, either in A&E or in an outpatient clinic, would have prevented most of these inappropriate admissions, and home support would have expedited the ability to discharge some patients. Further research into the costs and benefits of methods for providing these services is needed urgently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9328544      PMCID: PMC1060506          DOI: 10.1136/jech.51.4.386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  15 in total

1.  A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.

Authors:  R H Brook; M R Chassin; A Fink; D H Solomon; J Kosecoff; R E Park
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  The inappropriate use of acute hospital beds in an inner London District Health Authority.

Authors:  C Victor; B Nazareth; M Hudson; N Fulop
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1993

3.  Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.

Authors:  R E Park; A Fink; R H Brook; M R Chassin; K L Kahn; N J Merrick; J Kosecoff; D H Solomon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures.

Authors:  M R Chassin; J Kosecoff; R E Park; C M Winslow; K L Kahn; N J Merrick; J Keesey; A Fink; D H Solomon; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care.

Authors:  P M Gertman; J D Restuccia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  WHO to concentrate HIV strategy on vaginal microbicide.

Authors:  C Cookson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-11-27

7.  Primary medical care outside normal working hours: review of published work.

Authors:  L Hallam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-22

8.  A comparative analysis of appropriateness of hospital use.

Authors:  J D Restuccia; P Gertman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Measuring the clinical appropriateness of the use of a procedure. Can we do it?

Authors:  K L Kahn; J Kosecoff; M R Chassin; M F Flynn; A Fink; N Pattaphongse; D H Solomon; R H Brook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Use of hospital beds: a cohort study of admissions to a provincial teaching hospital.

Authors:  P Anderson; J Meara; S Brodhurst; S Attwood; M Timbrell; A Gatherer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Using electronic medical record systems for admission decisions in emergency departments: examining the crowdedness effect.

Authors:  Ofir Ben-Assuli; Moshe Leshno; Itamar Shabtai
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  EHR in emergency rooms: exploring the effect of key information components on main complaints.

Authors:  Ofir Ben-Assuli; Itamar Shabtai; Moshe Leshno; Shawndra Hill
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Ophthalmic admissions in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.

Authors:  O H Onakpoya; B O Adegbehingbe; A O Adeoye; B A Adewara
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Inappropriate admissions: thoughts of patients and referring doctors.

Authors:  J Campbell
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Use of emergency observation and assessment wards: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  M W Cooke; J Higgins; P Kidd
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  A report on an acute, in-hours, outpatient review clinic with ultrasonography facilities for the early evaluation of general surgical patients.

Authors:  T E Pidgeon; U Shariff; F Devine; V Menon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  The impact of EHR and HIE on reducing avoidable admissions: controlling main differential diagnoses.

Authors:  Ofir Ben-Assuli; Itamar Shabtai; Moshe Leshno
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.