Literature DB >> 7177643

Reaction-time determination of the latency between visual signals generated by rods and cones.

J L Barbur.   

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a series of reaction-time measurements in response to light flashes which stimulate preferentially either the rod of the cone receptor mechanisms in human vision. The average response latency between rod- and cone-generated signals as determined from these measurements was found to be 80 ms. Similar response latency values were also obtained from measurements involving only visual responses to real- and apparent-motion stimuli. The results show that the rod-cone response latency, measured by reaction-time or visual methods is relatively constant for target presentation locations between 4 and 9 degrees of visual angle from the fovea along the horizontal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7177643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  10 in total

1.  Linking impulse response functions to reaction time: rod and cone reaction time data and a computational model.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Rod-cone interactions and the temporal impulse response of the cone pathway.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Combination of rod and cone inputs in parasol ganglion cells of the magnocellular pathway.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Barry B Lee; Hao Sun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The perception of moving comets at high retinal illuminance levels: a rod-cone interaction effect.

Authors:  J L Barbur; G M Dunn; J A Wilson
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Effect of rod-cone interactions on mesopic visual performance mediated by chromatic and luminance pathways.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Michelle L Maynard; Daniel S Joyce; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Influence of background size, luminance and eccentricity on different adaptation mechanisms.

Authors:  Alejandro H Gloriani; Beatriz M Matesanz; Pablo A Barrionuevo; Isabel Arranz; Luis Issolio; Santiago Mar; Juan A Aparicio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-22

8.  Determinants of Test Variability in Scotopic Microperimetry: Effects of Dark Adaptation and Test Indices.

Authors:  Giovanni Montesano; Timos K Naska; Bethany E Higgins; David M Wright; Ruth E Hogg; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Effect of central and peripheral cone- and rod-specific stimulation on the pupillary light reflex.

Authors:  Anton Sonntag; Carina Kelbsch; Ronja Jung; Helmut Wilhelm; Torsten Strasser; Tobias Peters; Krunoslav Stingl; Barbara Wilhelm
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.029

10.  Dissociation of perception and action in audiovisual multisensory integration.

Authors:  Lynnette M Leone; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.386

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.