Literature DB >> 7167357

Confusability and interference between members of parafoveal letter pairs.

G Chastain.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1982        PMID： 7167357     DOI： 10.3758/bf03204213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Perturbation model for letter identification.

Authors:  G Wolford
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Bjork; J Thomas Murray
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing.

Authors:  W K Estes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The distribution of information within letters.

Authors:  J Shimron; D Navon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-11

5.  Asymmetric identification of parafoveal stimulus pairs: feature perturbations on failure in feature extraction?

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1981-03

6.  Feature-specific border effects in the discrimination of letter-like forms.

Authors:  M J White
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-02

7.  Evidence for feature perturbations.

Authors:  G Wolford; K H Shum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-05

8.  Asymmetry of visual interference.

Authors:  W P Banks; D W Larson; W Prinzmetal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-06
  8 in total
  18 in total

1.  Crowding and surround suppression: not to be confused.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Ariella V Popple; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Crowding is directed to the fovea and preserves only feature contrast.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Ariella V Popple
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The effects of hemispheric differences on feature perturbations.

Authors:  J Polich; K D Mackie; K M Spencer; K Ohashi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

4.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John A Greenwood; Thomas A Carlson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Emma Zilber; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target-flanker similarity.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bernard; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Hemispheric differences for feature perception.

Authors:  J Polich; D L Crossman; D P DeFrancesco
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1988

8.  Task and contrast effects on performance with parafoval stimulus pairs.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1983

9.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex; John R Cass; Roger J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.