Literature DB >> 1792298

The effects of hemispheric differences on feature perturbations.

J Polich1, K D Mackie, K M Spencer, K Ohashi.   

Abstract

Hemispheric differences for feature perturbations were investigated in two experiments. Stimulus displays consisting of five small squares arranged in a single row were presented tachistoscopically, with the subject instructed to state in which square a horizontal tick mark was located. Ticks could occur in any of the three middle squares, with half of the ticks presented on the inside and half presented on the outside of the square in relation to the fovea. Experiment 1 presented each array of five squares to the right or left of fixation at one of three distances from the fovea. Experiment 2 manipulated the distance between the squares and kept foveal distance constant. In each experiment, fewer errors were made when stimuli were presented to the left visual field/right hemisphere than when they were presented to the right visual field/left hemisphere, when ticks migrated toward the fovea. Experiment 1 found that increasing the distance from the fovea increased the error rate, but did not change the hemispheric differences. Experiment 2 found that increasing the distance between the squares did not change hemispheric effects reliably. The data imply that hemispheric differences for perceptual processing begin very early during sensory analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1792298     DOI: 10.1007/bf00920480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  29 in total

1.  Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli.

Authors:  K Patterson; J L Bradshaw
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Hemispheric local/global processing revisited.

Authors:  J Polich; V Aguilar
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-06

3.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires.

Authors:  M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Evidence for feature perturbations from character misidentifications.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-04

5.  Feature similarity and laterality effects in visual masking.

Authors:  J B Hellige
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Lateral interference and perceptual grouping in visual detection.

Authors:  W P Banks; H White
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

7.  Lateral masking as a function of spacing.

Authors:  G Wolford; L Chambers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

8.  Lateral differences in the detection of stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  A Grabowska
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Theoretical and methodological consequences of variations in exposure duration in visual laterality studies.

Authors:  J Sergent
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-05

10.  Hemispheric differences for visual search: serial vs parallel processing revisited.

Authors:  J M Polich
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.