Literature DB >> 7155532

Functional scoring of the binocular field.

B Esterman.   

Abstract

A new method for evaluating the total (BINOCULAR) field is based on FUNCTION instead of on anatomy. According to the author's theory of relative values, certain areas of the field are functionally more important than others in human activity. The new system imitates nature by plotting the total field binocularly instead of combining the two conventional monocular fields. Scoring is then done by a new binocular grid--a relative value scale, weighted exactly like its monocular prototype to favor the functionally more valuable parts of the field. The new method also led to the discovery of "binocular enhancement" that produces scores more realistic than formerly possible. Especially useful to ophthalmic consultants for evaluating visual capability or disability in industry, law and government (workers compensation, motor vehicle, social security, aviation, military), the new scale works accurately and rapidly with most existing perimeters, manual or automated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7155532     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34647-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  39 in total

1.  Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a prospective longitudinal evaluation.

Authors:  A Brahma; F Ennis; R Harper; A Ridgway; A Tullo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  [Proposed scoring system for assessment of functional impairment due to visual field defects].

Authors:  J Weber; U Schiefer; G Kolling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Quality of life and visual function in patients with intermediate uveitis.

Authors:  C C Murphy; E H Hughes; N A Frost; A D Dick
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Binocular Measures of Visual Acuity and Visual Field versus Binocular Approximations.

Authors:  David C Musch; Leslie M Niziol; Brenda W Gillespie; Paul R Lichter; Nancy K Janz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Modified method for assessment of the binocular fusional field in patients with suppression.

Authors:  Teiji Yagasaki; Yoshimi Oya; Mariko Maeda; Makiko Tsukui
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  The effect of regression towards the mean on visual disability rating scales.

Authors:  T J Smith
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  A practical approach to measuring the visual field component of fitness to drive.

Authors:  D P Crabb; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings; A C Viswanathan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Visual field loss and risk of fractures in older women.

Authors:  Anne L Coleman; Steven R Cummings; Kristine E Ensrud; Fei Yu; Peter Gutierrez; Katie L Stone; Jane A Cauley; Kathryn L Pedula; Marc C Hochberg; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.