Literature DB >> 7142038

Auditory thresholds in rats of different age and strain. A behavioral and electrophysiological study.

E Borg.   

Abstract

The auditory sensitivity of albino rats was determined behaviorally by conditioned suppression of licking and electrophysiologically by the auditory brain stem response (ABR). The behavioral thresholds were obtained with 10-Hz frequency-modulated tones, and the ABR with 1/1- or 1/3-octave filtered sine waves. Individual variability, reproducibility of responses and the influence of sex, age and strain were investigated. The behavioral and electrophysiological techniques were compared in animals with noise-induced high-frequency hearing losses. The results showed the highest degree of normal auditory sensitivity to be around 12-24 kHz. The variability in 20 rats was about 15 dB. In young animals, strain and sex had no influence. A deterioration in high-frequency hearing sensitivity was observed in aged hypertensive rats, whereas normotensive ones showed only minimal changes. The thresholds obtained with the electrophysiological (ABR) technique were 10-20 dB higher than those obtained behaviorally. Both techniques (behavioral and 1/3-octave ABR) assess high-frequency hearing loss equally well. It was concluded that the ABR (1/3-octave filtered sine waves) is suitable for the determination of hearing thresholds and the assessment of hearing loss, at least in the high-frequency range. The ABR technique is especially useful in long-term experiments during which thresholds are determined repeatedly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7142038     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(82)90069-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  21 in total

1.  A comparison of auditory brainstem responses across diving bird species.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Catherine E Carr; Glenn H Olsen; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Is the din really harmless? Long-term effects of non-traumatic noise on the adult auditory system.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline; Florian Occelli; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  In-air hearing of a diving duck: A comparison of psychoacoustic and auditory brainstem response thresholds.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Characteristics of auditory brainstem responses in ground squirrels.

Authors:  N J Hamill; M D McGinn; J M Horowitz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  The Protective Effect of Nigella sativa Oil against Experimentally Induced Cisplatin Ototoxicity: An Animal Study.

Authors:  Numan Kökten; Oğuz Kadir Eğilmez; Murat Erinç; A Işın Doğan Ekici; Serkan Şerifler; Erdem Yeşilada; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcıoğlu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

6.  Basic determinants for FM responses in the inferior colliculus of rats.

Authors:  P W Poon; X Chen; J C Hwang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Electrophysiological effects of the clinically used local anesthetics lidocaine, lidocaine-prilocaine and phenol on the rat's inner ear.

Authors:  S H Schmidt; M Anniko; S Hellström
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Asymmetrical stimulus generalization following differential fear conditioning.

Authors:  Sun Jung Bang; Timothy A Allen; Lauren K Jones; Pawel Boguszewski; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  The FBN rat model of aging: investigation of ABR waveforms and ribbon synapse changes.

Authors:  Rui Cai; Scott C Montgomery; Kaley A Graves; Donald M Caspary; Brandon C Cox
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Frequency discrimination in rats measured with tone-step stimuli and discrete pure tones.

Authors:  Andrew M Sloan; Owen T Dodd; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.