Literature DB >> 3241315

The effect of induced abortion on the risks and outcome of a trial of labor after a previous cesarean birth.

K C Edelin, D Oellerich, J R Larrieux.   

Abstract

Sixty-one women with previous cesarean deliveries who received prenatal care at Boston City Hospital or one of the neighborhood health centers affiliated with its obstetrical service elected to undergo a trial of labor (TOL) and attempt a vaginal birth after a cesarean (VBAC). Overall, 70 percent of these women achieved a vaginal delivery. When women who gave a history of a previous induced abortion were examined as a separate subgroup, they were able to achieve a vaginal birth not significantly different from those women in the overall group. There were no instances of uterine scar dehiscence or rupture in the series, leading to the conclusion that induced abortion, whether it occurs before or after the primary cesarean, is not a contraindication to a trial of labor with subsequent pregnancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion, Induced; Americas; Cesarean Section; Delivery; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postconception; Massachusetts; North America; Northern America; Obstetrical Surgery; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcomes; Prospective Studies; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Studies; Surgery; Treatment; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3241315      PMCID: PMC2625861     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  12 in total

1.  Vaginal delivery following cesarean section: use of oxytocin augmentation and epidural anesthesia with internal tocodynamic and internal fetal monitoring.

Authors:  B L Flamm; C Dunnett; E Fischermann; E J Quilligan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Trial of labor in patients with multiple previous cesarean sections.

Authors:  R P Porreco; P R Meier
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 0.142

3.  Cesarean section delivery rates: United States, 1981.

Authors:  P J Placek; S Taffel; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth.

Authors:  R H Paul; J P Phelan; S Y Yeh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Previous cesarean birth. Trial of labor in women with macrosomic infants.

Authors:  J P Phelan; G S Eglinton; J M Horenstein; S L Clark; S Yeh
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 0.142

6.  Oxytocin use during a trial of labor in patients with previous cesarean section.

Authors:  J M Horenstein; G S Eglinton; M P Tahilramaney; M Boucher; J P Phelan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Trial of labor after previous cesarean section: prognostic indicators of outcome.

Authors:  N N Demianczuk; D J Hunter; D W Taylor
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Trial labor following previous cesarean section.

Authors:  A R Graham
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.

Authors:  P H Shiono; D McNellis; G G Rhoads
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Trial of labor following cesarean section: a two-year experience.

Authors:  P R Meier; R P Porreco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.