Literature DB >> 7133778

Roles of the qualities and locations of stimuli and responses in simple associative learning. The quality-location hypothesis.

J D Miller, C A Bowe.   

Abstract

The Quality-Location Phenomenon is defined by the previous research of Lawicka (1964 and 1969) in which dogs easily learn go/no-go tasks to differences in stimulus quality and go-left/go-right tasks to differences in stimulus location whereas the opposite pairings of tasks and stimulus attributes are difficult to learn. The Lawicka-Konorski explanation in terms of drive differentiation and response selection is described, and a new hypothesis, the Quality-Location Hypothesis, is offered. This hypothesis states that the quality of a stimulus best serves as a cue for the quality of a response, whereas the location of a stimulus best serves as a cue for the location of a response. The evidence for the hypothesis is reviewed, and experimental considerations for its evaluation are mentioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7133778     DOI: 10.1007/bf03001207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci        ISSN: 0093-2213


  20 in total

1.  SPATIAL VARIABLES, OBSERVING RESPONSES, AND DISCRIMINATION LEARNING SETS.

Authors:  F STOLLNITZ
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Successive and simultaneous discrimination as a function of stimulus-similarity.

Authors:  E F MACCASLIN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-06

3.  Perceptual differentiation in the course of nondifferential reinforcement.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN; A D CALVIN; C B ELAM
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-10

4.  Simultaneous and successive discrimination.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN; J WODINSKY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1953-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Situational determinants of the relative difficulty of simultaneous and successive discrimination.

Authors:  J WODINSKY; M A VARLEY; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-08

6.  Response-selection in discriminative learning.

Authors:  P WEISE; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-05       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Control of responding by location of auditory stimuli: adjacency of sound and response.

Authors:  J M Harrison; S D Iversen; S R Pratt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Qualitative versus directional cues in differential conditioning. I. Left leg-right leg differentiation to cues on a mixed character.

Authors:  C Dobrzecka; J Konorski
Journal:  Acta Biol Exp (Warsz)       Date:  1967

9.  Qualitative versus directional cue in differential conditioning. II. Go-no go differentiation to cues of a mixed character.

Authors:  G Szwejkowska
Journal:  Acta Biol Exp (Warsz)       Date:  1967

10.  Qualitative versus directional cues in two forms of differentiation.

Authors:  C Dobrzecka; G Szejkowska; J Konorski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Auditory discrimination: the Konorski quality-location effect.

Authors:  J C Neill; J M Harrison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Constraints on vocal production learning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Yoshimasa Seki; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.