Literature DB >> 10478160

Regional variations in the use of home care services in Ontario, 1993/95.

P C Coyte1, W Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although regional variations in the use of many health care services have been reported, little attention has been devoted to home care practices. Given the dramatic shift in care settings from hospitals to private homes, it is important to determine the extent to which home care practices vary by geographic region.
METHODS: Data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information and the Ontario Home Care Administration System database were used to assess regional variations in rates of home care use following inpatient care and same-day surgery for the fiscal years 1993, 1994 and 1995. Various measures of regional variation were employed.
RESULTS: Of the 2,870,695 inpatient separations and 1,803,307 same-day surgery separations during the study period, 359,972 and 64,541, respectively, were followed by home care. The rate of home care use per 100 separations was 12.5 for inpatients and 3.6 for same-day surgery patients. There was a a 3.5-fold regional variation in the rates of home care use following inpatient care and a 7-fold variation in rates of use following same-day surgery. Additional home care funding to attain calculated target rates was estimated to be $48.9 million (30% of expenditures for patients recently discharged from hospital over the study period). For a 20% increase in service provision it was estimated that an additional injection of $42.2 million is required.
INTERPRETATION: The wide regional variations in rates of home care use highlight the importance of modifying home care funding to ensure that all residents of Ontario have equal access to services. To achieve this our estimates suggest that a substantial increase in home care funding is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10478160      PMCID: PMC1230537     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  16 in total

1.  Home care: the Ontario experience.

Authors:  R L Stewart; M Lund
Journal:  Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care       Date:  1990

2.  Impact of home care on hospital days: a meta analysis.

Authors:  S L Hughes; A Ulasevich; F M Weaver; W Henderson; L Manheim; J D Kubal; F Bonarigo
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The use of Medicare home health care services.

Authors:  H G Welch; D E Wennberg; W P Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The extremal quotient in small-area variation analysis.

Authors:  V A Kazandjian; P W Durance; M A Schork
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis.

Authors:  P Diehr; K Cain; F Connell; E Volinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The state of outcome research: are we on target?

Authors:  S Greenfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Small area variations in health care delivery.

Authors:  J Wennberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Variations in medical care among small areas.

Authors:  J Wennberg; A Gittelsohn
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.

Authors:  K McPherson; J E Wennberg; O B Hovind; P Clifford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Seven reasons why it is so difficult to make community-based long-term care cost-effective.

Authors:  W G Weissert
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Home assessment and care.

Authors:  C Ferrier; P Lysy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The Magnitude, Share and Determinants of Private Costs Incurred by Clients (and Their Caregivers) of In-home Publicly Financed Care.

Authors:  Vivian W Leong; Denise N Guerriere; Ruth Croxford; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-08

3.  Home care evolution in alberta: how have palliative clients fared?

Authors:  Donna M Wilson; Corrine Truman; Joe Huang; Sam Sheps; Stephen Birch; Roger Thomas; Tom Noseworthy
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-05

4.  Allocation of Rehabilitation Services for Older Adults in the Ontario Home Care System.

Authors:  Joshua J Armstrong; Joanie Sims-Gould; Paul Stolee
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Work in progress. Integrating physicians' services in the home.

Authors:  C L McWilliam; M Stewart; J Sangster; I Cohen; J Mitchell; C Sutherland; B Ryan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly?

Authors:  Helen Hoenig; Donald H Taylor; Frank A Sloan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.