Literature DB >> 7129822

The influence of ambient and viewbox light upon visual detection of low-contrast targets in a radiograph.

A J Alter, G A Kargas, S A Kargas, J R Cameron, J C McDermott.   

Abstract

Thirty-one observers (five radiologists, five radiology residents, and 21 nonradiologists) examined low-contrast images of 13 polyvinylchloride cylinders. Image density ranged from 1.91 to 2.05 OD units with a background density of 2.09 OD units. The experiment tested visual performance under various clinically relevant lighting conditions by asking the observers to locate a groove in each cylinder. Use of low ambient light and restricting light from surrounding veiwboxes significantly improved performance (P less than 0.0001). In general, the less the amount of extraneous light, the higher was the detection rate. Some observers did significantly better than others. Reduced scattering of light within the eye is suggested as an explanation for their increased performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7129822     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198207000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  7 in total

1.  The effects of ambient lighting in chest radiology reading rooms.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pollard; Ehsan Samei; Amarpreet S Chawla; Craig Beam; Laura E Heyneman; Lynne M Hurwitz Koweek; Santiago Martinez-Jimenez; Lacey Washington; Noriyuki Hashimoto; H Page McAdams
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The digital imaging workstation. 1990.

Authors:  Ronald L Arenson; Dev P Chakraborty; Sridhar B Seshadri; Harold L Kundel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Experience and design recommendations for picture archiving and communication systems in the surgical setting.

Authors:  S M Pomerantz; E L Siegel; Z Protopapas; B I Reiner; E R Pickar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.

Authors:  J Wang; S Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Radiographic viewing conditions at Johannesburg Hospital.

Authors:  T Nyathi; An Mwale; P Segone; Sh Mhlanga; Ml Pule
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2008-04-01

7.  Effects of Different Viewing Conditions on Radiographic Interpretation.

Authors:  Mahkameh Moshfeghi; Majid Shahbazian; Soodabeh Sadat Sajadi; Sepideh Sajadi; Hossein Ansari
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.