Literature DB >> 8854262

Experience and design recommendations for picture archiving and communication systems in the surgical setting.

S M Pomerantz1, E L Siegel, Z Protopapas, B I Reiner, E R Pickar.   

Abstract

An analysis of the efficacy of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in the surgical domain was undertaken at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Interviews with surgeons and staff were conducted and supplemented by direct radiologist observation in the operating room (OR) and surgical outpatient clinic to determine patterns of routine clinical PACS use, levels of satisfaction both within and outside of the OR, and perceptions of the relative efficacy of the system in comparison to film. These data as well as suggestions from the surgical staff members were used to make recommendations for specific modifications in PACS design and operation to improve the current system and to help prescribe design improvements for future PAC systems. A high level of satisfaction with the system was found and the use of PACS was favored over film by a majority of surgeons and their staff. Findings of this study suggest that the design of a hospital-wide PAC system must have the flexibility to accommodate the specific requirements of a wide variety of end-users in their unique hospital environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8854262     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Hospital takes plunge into full-fledged PACS.

Authors:  E L Siegel
Journal:  Diagn Imaging (San Franc)       Date:  1993-02

2.  Electronic imaging workstations: ergonomic issues and the user interface.

Authors:  S C Horii
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  The practical use and evaluation of picture archiving and communication system in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  I Yamamoto; K Kaneda
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Default display arrangements of images on PACS monitors.

Authors:  N H Strickland; D J Allison
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Integration of a voice processor machine in a PACS.

Authors:  C M Breant; R K Taira; H K Huang
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Requirements for PACS: users' perspective.

Authors:  D Gur; C R Fuhrman; F L Thaete
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Making filmless radiology work.

Authors:  E L Siegel; J N Diaconis; S Pomerantz; R Allman; B Briscoe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Small PACS for digital medical images--reliability and security in a clinical setting.

Authors:  C Kuroda; H Yoshioka; T Kadota; Y Narumi; H Okamoto; T Kumatani; O Hiruma; Y Kumatani; J Yoshida
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Effect of ambient light on electronically displayed medical images as measured by luminance-discrimination thresholds.

Authors:  D C Rogers; R E Johnston; S M Pizer
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 10.  Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS).

Authors:  J C Honeyman; M M Frost; W Huda; W Loeffler; M Ott; E V Staab
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug
View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical input into designing a PACS.

Authors:  D M Yousem; N J Beauchamp
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Technologies for image distribution in hospitals.

Authors:  Elmar Kotter; Tobias Baumann; Dieter Jäger; Mathias Langer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) print service for chest imaging.

Authors:  D M Tucker; C T Suitor; S J Shepard; D F Schomer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.