Literature DB >> 7127937

Revision of total knee arthroplasty.

J N Insall, D A Dethmers.   

Abstract

In 72 knees, revision total knee arthroplasties were comparable in results with primary operations. There was a higher incidence of extensor mechanism problems and less complete relief of pain. Although the incidence of postoperative radiolucencies was high, these were nonprogressive and, in most cases, not harbingers of progressive loosening. Revision surgery requires surgical skill and judgment, as well as facilities to provide a wide range of prosthetic sizes and, if necessary, custom designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7127937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  The influence of metal backing in unicompartmental tibial component fixation. An in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of micromotion.

Authors:  L Ryd; A Lindstrand; A Stenström; G Selvik
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: To cement or not to cement?

Authors:  P Cherubino; C Castelli; F A Grassi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1996-02

3.  [The modular MML revision system in knee revision and tumor arthroplasty].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; A Töpfer; J Kircher; H Grundei; P Diehl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The New Jersey Low-Contact-Stress Knee Replacement System: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases.

Authors:  F F Buechel; M J Pappas
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1986

5.  Micromotion of conventionally cemented all-polyethylene tibial components in total knee replacements. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of migration and inducible displacement.

Authors:  L Ryd; A Lindstrand; R Rosenquist; G Selvik
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1987

6.  Peri-implant stress correlates with bone and cement morphology: Micro-FE modeling of implanted cadaveric glenoids.

Authors:  Hwabok Wee; April D Armstrong; Wesley W Flint; Allen R Kunselman; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus-valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis.

Authors:  Joon Kyu Lee; Sahnghoon Lee; Dongwook Kim; Sang Min Lee; Jak Jang; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Sun-Chul Hwang; Jae-Yeon Kong; Dae-Cheol Nam; Dong-Hee Kim; Hyung-Bin Park; Soon-Taek Jeong; Se-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04

Review 9.  Complications involving the extensor mechanism after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rocco Papalia; Sebastiano Vasta; Stefano D'Adamio; Erika Albo; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Minimum Two-year Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Infectious or Non-infectious Causes.

Authors:  Kyoung-Jai Lee; Jae-Young Moon; Eun-Kyoo Song; Hong-An Lim; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.