Literature DB >> 7121092

Procedures and discrepancies of blood pressure measurements in two community health centers.

L W Scherwitz, L A Evans, D J Hennrikus, C Vallbona.   

Abstract

Three studies of blood pressure measurement were conducted in two primary care clinics. In study I, procedures for taking blood pressure were observed for seven nurses, and their readings were compared with readings taken in a standard manner. The results show that the nurses' procedure needed improvement; the systolic/diastolic discrepancies with the standard averaged 10.2/7.5 mmHg. In study II, the nurses were trained to improve their procedure, and readings were again compared. The results show improvement for moderate, but not for large, discrepancies in diastolic readings. In study III, two physicians' procedure for taking blood pressure indicated that their procedures could also be improved. Overall, there was little correlation between potential biases in providers' procedures and discrepancies with the standard. The discrepancies between the nurse and physician readings led to different treatment indicators in 22-26 per cent of the observations.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7121092     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198207000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  6 in total

1.  Blood pressure measurement by family physicians.

Authors:  R C Dickson; N J Birkett
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Accurate, reproducible measurement of blood pressure.

Authors:  N R Campbell; A Chockalingam; J G Fodor; D W McKay
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Agreement between large and small cuffs in sphygmomanometry: a quantitative assessment.

Authors:  Y Iyriboz; C M Hearon; K Edwards
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-03

4.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society's consensus conference on the management of mild hypertension.

Authors:  A G Logan
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Diagnosis of hypertension in adults.

Authors:  R B Haynes; Y Lacourcière; S W Rabkin; F H Leenen; A G Logan; N Wright; C E Evans
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Impact of operator hearing threshold on manual blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Abubakar Danjuma Salisu; Aminu Bakari; Hamisu Abdullahi
Journal:  Ann Afr Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.