Literature DB >> 7095437

Surface distribution of steady-state cortical potentials evoked by visual half-field stimulation.

K Yanashima.   

Abstract

The surface distribution of steady-state cortical potentials (VECP) evoked by visual half-field stimulation was analyzed by using the fast Fourier transform (FFT). For all ten normal subjects, checkerboard stimulation of the lower visual half-field evoked the largest response at electrode location Oz, with stimulation for the upper visual half-field at Pz. Recording at Pz, a phase difference of approximately 180 degrees was observed for cortical potentials evoked by lower and upper half-field stimulation, the response being bigger for upper field than for full-field stimulation. Comparing the VECP elicited by stimulation of the right and the left half-field, six of ten subjects displayed the highest amplitude at the contralateral cortex (anatomical type), three subjects at the midline (central type), and one subject at the ipsilateral cortex (paradoxical lateralization type). At Oz there was little phase difference in the VECP with stimulation of the right and left visual half-field, and the amplitude was about half that for full-field stimulation. However, with the electrode placed at the temporal region of the skull there was a big phase difference of VECP signals; consequently, the sum of the amplitudes did not amount to the amplitude for full-field stimulation. The dipole theory of scalp distribution of VECP signals was found to be also applicable to conditions of steady-state stimulation, including polarity reversal for upper and lower visual half-field stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7095437     DOI: 10.1007/BF02215648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  10 in total

1.  A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response.

Authors:  G Barett; L Blumhardt; A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The topography of the visual evoked responses to half field stimulation [proceedings].

Authors:  M Beauchamp; W B Matthews; D Small; J F Stein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt; G Barrett; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; J G Axford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; J G Axford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man.

Authors:  W F Michael; A M Halliday
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-09-24       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W F Michael
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Evoked potentials from the human scalp to visual half-field stimulation.

Authors:  W A Cobb; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Spatial distribution of potentials evoked by half-field pattern-reversal and pattern-onset stimuli.

Authors:  C Shagass; M Amadeo; R A Roemer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-12

10.  Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The relation between the after-negative potential of the pattern electroretinogram and the visually evoked cortical potential.

Authors:  K Yanashima; M Yoshii; S Okisaka
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07-15       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Horizontal scalp distribution of steady-state pattern visual evoked cortical potentials in response to quadrant field stimulation.

Authors:  Y Kakisu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Central visual function and inner retinal structure in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Li-Juan Xu; Sha-Ling Li; Vance Zemon; Yan-Qian Xie; Yuan-Bo Liang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020 Apr.       Impact factor: 3.066

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.